Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 9;10(8):1058. doi: 10.3390/nu10081058

Table 3.

Effects of L. paracasei KW3110 on CFF values.

CFF (Hz) KW3110 Group (n = 28) Placebo Group (n = 31)
Week 0 Week 4 Week 8 Week 0 Week 4 Week 8
Before VDT load 39.13 ± 2.47 39.57 ± 2.95 39.98 ± 2.94 39.03 ± 2.62 39.45 ± 2.36 39.77 ± 2.83
After VDT load 37.68 ± 2.40 39.87 ± 2.52 ** 39.56 ± 2.92 ** 38.10 ± 2.97 39.24 ± 2.15 * 39.95 ± 2.13 *
Variation a −1.45 ± 2.38 0.30 ± 2.70 * −0.42 ± 2.31 −0.94 ± 2.04 −0.22 ± 2.03 0.17 ± 2.97

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. The within-group comparisons between week 0 and week 4 or week 8 were carried out using a paired Student’s t-test with a Holm correction for multiple comparisons (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05). a Variation indicated the difference of the values before and after the VDT load at each point. CFF = critical flicker frequency. VDT = visual display terminal. KW3110 = L. paracasei KW3110-treated group, placebo = control group.