Skip to main content
Animal Nutrition logoLink to Animal Nutrition
. 2018 May 4;4(3):250–255. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.04.006

Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: A review

Norma Heredia 1, Santos García 1,
PMCID: PMC6116329  PMID: 30175252

Abstract

Food-producing animals are the major reservoirs for many foodborne pathogens such as Campylobacter species, non-Typhi serotypes of Salmonella enterica, Shiga toxin-producing strains of Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes. The zoonotic potential of foodborne pathogens and their ability to produce toxins causing diseases or even death are sufficient to recognize the seriousness of the situation. This manuscript reviews the evidence that links animals as vehicles of the foodborne pathogens Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxigenic E. coli, and L. monocytogenes, their impact, and their current status. We conclude that these pathogenic bacteria will continue causing outbreaks and deaths throughout the world, because no effective interventions have eliminated them from animals and food.

Keywords: Animal food, Foodborne pathogens, Zoonosis, Enteropathogens, Pathogenic bacteriara

1. Introduction

Food-producing animals (e.g., cattle, chickens, pigs, and turkeys) are the major reservoirs for many foodborne pathogens such as Campylobacter species, non-Typhi serotypes of Salmonella enterica, Shiga toxin-producing strains of Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes. The zoonotic potential of foodborne pathogens and their ability to produce toxins causing diseases or even death are sufficient to recognize the seriousness of the situation. Foodborne pathogens cause millions of cases of sporadic illness and chronic complications, as well as large and challenging outbreaks in many countries and between countries. The magnitude of this problem is demonstrated by the significant proportion of the 1.5 billion annual diarrheal episodes in children less than 3 years of age that are caused by enteropathogenic microorganisms, which results in more than 3 million deaths per year (EFSA-ECDC, 2016). Surveys estimate that in the United States alone, bacterial enteric pathogens cause 9.4 million episodes of foodborne illness in humans, 55,961 hospitalizations, and 1,351 deaths each year (Scallan et al., 2011). However, it is estimated that the reported incidence of food-borne disease represents less than 1% to 10% of the real incidence (Scallan et al., 2011). The importance of food-producing animals as carriers of pathogenic bacteria is real; for example, beef is reported to be the vector of 7% of the 1.7 million cases of foodborne disease that was recorded from 1996 to 2000 in England and Wales (Anderson et al., 2009).

The increase of human population and urbanization, the per capita income, the globalization, the changes on consumer trends (more protein in the diet) have increased the consumption of animal products (Dhama et al., 2013). Estimations suggest that consumption of these products will rise to 376 million tons by 2030 (Dhama et al., 2013). This high demand of animal products provokes intensive animal production and processing of products, with an increased movement of foods globally. This situation could conduce to defective processing practices and an augment of the risk of contamination by foodborne pathogens at any point of the farm to fork chain.

Animal and animal products contamination is a serious concern because it is difficult to control. Many factors could be involved in contamination, including these from the environment (associated fauna, water from different sources, and animal manure disposal, etc.), and human related animal handling (slaughtering and processing practices, and storage procedures, etc.) (Sofos, 2008).

Microbial pathogens can cause disease by consumption of the animal products contaminated with microorganisms or their toxins (Table 1). This paper reviews the evidence that links animals as vehicles of the foodborne pathogens Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxigenic E. coli, and L. monocytogenes, their impact, and their current status.

Table 1.

Characteristics of four foodborne bacteria frequently carried by animals or animal products.

Bacteria Principal species involved Reservoir animal Food vehicle Transmission mode Disease in humans Principal signs and symptoms in humans
Salmonella spp. Salmonella Typhimurium Poultry, bovines, ovines, porcines, fish, and seafood, and some other cold blooded animals Poultry meat products, and eggs, undercooked meat or ground beef, and dairy products Ingestion of food or contaminated water, direct contact with infected animals or consumption of food from infected animals Localized gastroenteritis in humans and some animals Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, septicemia or bacteremia, and reactive arthritis as a post-infection sequela
Campylobacter spp. C. jejuni
C. coli
Poultry, cattle, pigs and piglets, domestic pets Poultry products, unpasteurized milk, and water Ingestion of contaminated food or water, direct contact with infected animals or consumption of food from infected animals Campylobacteriosis Acute diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, intestinal bloody diarrhea, esophageal diseases, periodontitis, functional gastrointestinal disorders, celiac disease, cholecystitis, and colon cancer
Shiga-toxin producing E. coli Serogroup O157 is most common, but O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 are also important Cattle, sheep, goats, and in a lower proportion pigs, cats, and dogs, and other ruminants Undercooked ground meat, raw milk, raw vegetables, fruits, water, cheese, curd, and juice Ingestion of contaminated food or water, direct contact with infected animals or consumption of food from infected animals and person-to-person contact Severe hemorrhagic colitis in humans Hemorrhagic diarrhea, acute abdominal cramping and vomiting, and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), as a sequela
Listeria spp. L. monocytogenes Cattle, sheep, goats, and poultry Crustaceans, shellfish, mollusks, cheese, beef, pork, vegetables and juices, and milk products Ingestion of food or water contaminated, direct contact with infected animals or consumption of food from infected animals and person-to-person contact Listeriosis 1) Invasive illness: meningitis, septicemia, primary bacteremia, endocarditis, non-meningitic central nervous system infection, conjunctivitis, and flu-like illness
2) Non-invasive: febrile gastroenteritis

2. Salmonella

Salmonella is found naturally in the environment and in both domestic and wild animals including cats, dogs, amphibians, reptiles, and rodents (Ellis, 1969). It is commonly found in the entrails of poultry, where in some cases could affect the health of the bird (McMullen, 2004, Park et al., 2017). Bacteria are acquired through parents or from the environment (Park et al., 2017). This bacterium causes salmonellosis and other diseases.

Salmonellosis is one of the most common foodborne diseases worldwide, accounting around 93.8 million foodborne illnesses and 155,000 deaths per year worldwide (Eng et al., 2015). Reports in the United States account for more than one million people sickened by Salmonella each year, and in approximately 20% of these cases, poultry was the pathogenic vehicle (Hoffmann et al., 2015). Data from 2000 to 2008 give an estimated average cost in health care of this foodborne illness of $55.5 to $93.2 billion, in the United States (Scharff, 2015). Reports from the EU in 2015 showed 94,625 confirmed cases of salmonellosis in humans and 126 deaths (EFSA-ECDC, 2016). The picture is obscure because of the emergence of multi-drug-resistant Salmonella serotypes, having a large impact on the efficacy of antibiotic treatment, and an increase in the prevalence of these resistant strains may lead to an increase in mortality caused by Salmonella infections (Eng et al., 2015).

The genera Salmonella is a member of Enterobacteriaceae family, and it includes Gram-negative, flagellated, non-sporulating, and facultative bacteria that grow well between 35 and 37 °C (Ricke et al., 2013). Members of Salmonella are commonly classified in 2,579 serotypes according to the Kauffman-White scheme, considering differences in flagellar (H), capsular (k), and somatic (O) antigens (Lamas et al., 2018). Additionally, Salmonella serotypes can be subdivided by molecular subtyping methods or by phage typing (Ricke et al., 2013). This bacterium has the ability to induce localized gastroenteritis in humans and some animals, but the range of infections in the host varies depending on the bacterial virulence factors and the immunity and host-resistant capability. The signs and symptoms could evolve from nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea to septicemia or bacteremia, and reactive arthritis as a post-infection sequela that has been reported (Ricke et al., 2013).

There are 2 major species of Salmonella: S. enterica and Salmonella bongori. S. bongori comprises 22 serotypes that are mainly associated with cold-blooded animals, and human infections are uncommon (Lamas, et al., 2018). S. enterica is divided into 6 subspecies (enterica, salamae, arizonae, diarizonae, houtenae, and indica) because of the differences in biochemical characteristics (Grimont and Weill, 2007). The subspecies enterica is responsible for more than 99% of human salmonellosis, and it includes 1,531 serotypes among which are Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis (Lamas et al., 2018). Humans are the only reservoir of typhoid Salmonella, produced by Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi. The rest of Salmonella serovars are known as non-typhoid, where the animals are the major reservoir (Eng et al., 2015). S. enterica, subsp. enterica serotypes, are principally related to warm-blooded animals whereas the other non-enterica subspecies are more related to cold-blooded animals, although some exceptions have been found (Lamas et al., 2018). The incidence of diseases caused by non-typhoid Salmonella varies between countries; for example, it is estimated to cause 690 cases per 100,000 population in Europe, while in Israel, non-typhoid Salmonella infection is around 100 cases per 100,000 annually (Eng et al., 2015).

S. Typhimurium is the most dominant serovar around the world, and it is associated with foodborne outbreaks in both developing and high-income countries (Mohammed, 2017). Salmonella serovar Newport is mainly isolated in Latin American, North American, and European countries; Salmonella Infantis is found globally; Salmonella Virchow is found more frequently in Asian, European, and Oceanic countries; Salmonella Hadar is found in European countries; and Salmonella Agona is found in Latin American, North American, and European countries (Hendriksen et al., 2011). Although there are differences in the most commonly isolated serovars among regions, the differences are not significant between countries within the same region (Hendriksen et al., 2011).

The transmission of non-typhoid Salmonella infection to humans can occur through the ingestion of food or water contaminated with waste of infected animals, by direct contact with infected animals or by consumption of food from infected animals (Eng et al., 2015). This bacterium has been isolated from a wide range of animals: poultry, ovines, porcines, fish, and seafood and their food products, and also from some other cold blooded animals (Nguyen et al., 2016, Flockhart et al., 2017, Zajac et al., 2016). Traditionally poultry, meat products, and eggs are the food sources most commonly identified as responsible for outbreaks of salmonellosis (Sanchez et al., 2002), although the microorganism has also been found in other foodstuffs. In the United States, outbreaks with a known vehicle that was associated with beef peaked at 30% in 1981, dropped to 4% in 1982, and after that it has been rising gradually. The proportion of Salmonella outbreaks caused by chicken and eggs also increased from 1973 to 1987 (Bean and Griffin, 1990).

Salmonella Thyphimurium has been linked mainly to consumption of undercooked meat or ground beef and dairy products, and especially raw eggs. Outbreaks by Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Heidelberg have been mainly associated with consumption of raw eggs, whereas outbreaks caused by Salmonella Newport have been linked to uncooked ground beef, runny scrambled eggs, or omelets (DuPont, 2007). One important characteristic of Salmonella Enteritidis is its ability to contaminate the contents of intact egg shells (DuPont, 2007).

3. Campylobacter

The Campylobacter genus was established in 1963, but it was not until 1972 that it was shown to be related to febrile hemorrhagic enteritis (García and Heredia, 2013). The illness caused by these bacteria is named campylobacteriosis, which is characterized by acute onset of diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fever, and it is usually self-limiting (Kaakoush et al., 2015). However, a range of other serious conditions within the gastrointestinal tract has been reported, including intestinal bloody diarrhea, esophageal diseases, periodontitis, functional gastrointestinal disorders, celiac disease, cholecystitis, and colon cancer. Approximately 3 out of 10,000 cases of campylobacteriosis will develop Guillain–Barré syndrome (severe demyelinating neuropathy, Skarp et al., 2016). It is estimated that each case of campylobacteriosis costs $920, mainly because of medical expenses and lost productivity (Silva et al., 2011).

The problem is getting worse because the number of cases of campylobacteriosis has dramatically increased in North America, Europe, and Australia, and data from some African, Asian, and Middle East countries indicate that the disease is endemic, especially in children (Kaakoush et al., 2015). It is estimated that Campylobacter is responsible for 400 to 500 million cases of infection each year worldwide (García and Heredia, 2013), and together with Salmonella, it is the most frequently isolated foodborne pathogen.

Campylobacter is a member of the family Campylobacteriaceae, which also includes the genera Arcobacter, and the species Bacteroides ureolyticus. The genus Campylobacter consists of 26 species, 2 provisional species, and 9 subspecies (Kaakoush et al., 2015). They can be divided into more than 600 penner serotypes (heat-stable antigens) and more of 100 Lior serotypes (heat-labile antigens), and only the thermotolerant species have clinical importance (García and Heredia, 2013).

The members of genus Campylobacter are small, curved or spiral-shaped Gram-negative bacilli that exhibit rapid and corkscrew-like motion via a polar flagellum, and grow optimally between 37 and 42 °C. For in vitro growth, these bacteria need partial oxygen tension (2% to 10%), but generally, Campylobacter spp. can be found in diverse environmental conditions because of their high genetic, metabolic, and phenotypic diversity in their population (García and Heredia, 2013). Although several Campylobacter species (Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. upsaliensis, C. lari, C. concisus, C. fetus, C. hyointestinalis, C. helveticus, C. insulaenigrae, C. mucosalis, C. rectus, C. sputorum, and C. ureolyticus) and Arcobacter butzleri have been reported to cause gastroenteritis (Butzler, 2004; Kaakoush et al., 2015), C. jejuni was the species that was most frequently isolated from man and retail poultry, and C. coli was generally the second most frequently isolated species. However, the ratio of C. coli to C. jejuni was considerably different in different countries such as Thailand and South Africa, where C. coli was the dominant species isolated from retail poultry (Suzuki and Yamamoto, 2009).

Analysis showed that international travel was the most important risk factor for campylobacteriosis, followed by consumption of undercooked chicken, environmental exposure, and direct contact with farm animals (Kaakoush et al., 2015). It is well documented that poultry products, unpasteurized milk, and water are the main vehicles for C. jejuni and C. coli infection (Butzler, 2004). Poultry is recognized as the primary source of food-related Campylobacter species transmission to humans (Kaakoush et al., 2015), probably because of their higher body temperature. Handling, preparation, and consumption of broiler meat may account for 20% to 30% of human campylobacteriosis cases, while 50% to 80% may be attributed to the chicken reservoir as a whole (EFSA, 2010). However, bacterial prevalence in poultry and the contamination level of poultry products varies greatly among countries. For example, an average of 58.8% of retail poultry meats and 60.3% of poultry by-products, were contaminated with Campylobacter spp. in Japan (Suzuki and Yamamoto, 2009) whereas 77.3% and 70.7% of poultry at retail was contaminated in the United Kingdom and the United States, respectively (Kramer et al., 2000, Zhao et al., 2001).

Several risk factors such as flock size, age of birds, environmental water supplies, insects and air quality can be linked to colonization and transmission of Campylobacter spp. in broiler flocks (Horrocks et al., 2009). Once colonization occurs, the intestinal tract of the chicken (cecum and colon) can harbor large amounts of Campylobacter and can contaminate the skin of the carcass during slaughtering if an intestinal leak or rupture occurs (Silva et al., 2011).

Cattle have also been associated with cases of campylobacteriosis. Bacteria prevalence varies greatly from 6% to nearly 90% (Kaakoush et al., 2015). The species detected in cattle include C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. lanienae, which show higher levels in feedlots (64% to 68%) compared to adult pastured cattle (6.3% to 7.3%; Horrocks et al., 2009). Campylobacter species are also prevalent in pigs and piglets (from 32.8% to 85.0% depending the age of the animal). Bacteria can colonize piglets 24 h after birth, because of exposure to contaminated feces (Kaakoush et al., 2015).

Sheep and goats have also been reported to carry Campylobacter species, with a prevalence from 6.8% to 17.5% (Kaakoush et al., 2015). In addition to all the risks described, contact with domestic pets also presents another exposure pathway for human infection (Silva et al., 2011). Up to 58% of healthy dogs and 97% of diarrheic dogs have been determined to be positive for Campylobacter species (Kaakoush et al., 2015).

4. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC)

E. coli is the predominant nonpathogenic flora of the human intestine with the exception of anaerobic bacteria, and it helps in the production of vitamins, and competes with and suppresses pathogenic bacterial growth (Feng, 2013). However, some strains have developed the ability to cause disease in the gastrointestinal, urinary, or central nervous system by the acquisition of virulence factors that have allowed them to adapt to new niches (Farrokh et al., 2013).

E. coli is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobe, non-sporulating rod within the family Enterobacteriaceae. It has the ability to ferment different sugars, but lactose fermentation (with production of acid and gas) is a characteristic of the species (Feng, 2013).

The species E. coli is divided into serogroups and serotypes according to its antigenic composition, based on the Kauffman classification scheme (somatic or O antigens for serogroups and flagellar or H antigens for serotypes) (Feng, 2013). There are 174 E. coli O and 53 E. coli H antigens that have been recognized (Croxen et al., 2013).

Most E. coli strains are commensal in the intestine, but a small group harbor virulence factors known as E. coli pathotypes, or pathogenic, diarrheagenic, or enterovirulent E. coli. These include enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), STEC, enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC), and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), as well as a new pathotype, adherent invasive E. coli (AIEC) (Croxen et al., 2013). Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is a subset of pathogenic STEC strains (Feng, 2013).

The presence of the gene encoding Shiga toxins (stx 1 or stx 2), generally acquired via a lambdoid bacteriophage, classifies the strain as STEC or verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC, Croxen et al., 2013). Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, including O157 and many non-O157 serogroups, are important causes of foodborne diseases. Although many outbreaks throughout the world have been attributed to O157:H7, approximately 400 STEC serotypes are considered to be implicated in the disease (Karmali et al., 2010).

The most common STEC serogroup implicated in severe illness in humans is O157, but serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 (also known as the Big 6), are the most commonly found non-O157 STEC strains (Croxen et al., 2013). Prevalence of STEC serogroups differs geographically; for example in Australia, non-O157 STEC strains corresponded to 42% of all STEC isolates, where O111 and O26 were the most commonly found serogroups (Croxen et al., 2013), whereas in the EU, O157, O26, O111, O103, and O145 are the serogroups of major concern, but not O45 and O121 (Feng, 2013). Additionally, the importance of serogroup O182 is increasing, showing a larger increment between 2011 and 2013 in EU (EFSA, 2015).

Shiga-toxigenic E. coli typically causes severe hemorrhagic colitis in humans, which is accompanied by acute abdominal cramping and vomiting (Anderson et al., 2009). However, several STEC strains are of serious public health concern because their association with large outbreaks and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), which is a sequela in 3% to 7% cases overall, and is the leading cause of acute renal failure in children (Feng, 2013). Reports have estimated that STEC causes 2,801,000 acute illnesses annually worldwide and leads to 3,890 cases of HUS, 270 cases of end-stage renal disease, and 230 deaths in the United States, costing more than $1 billion each year in direct and indirect costs (Majowicz et al., 2014).

The modes by which STEC infection is transmitted in human populations include foodborne transmission, environmental transmission from contaminated animals or water, and transmission through person-to-person contact (DuPont, 2007). It is estimated that animal contact constitutes 8% of non-O157 and 6% of O157:H7 STEC illnesses in the United States (Croxen et al., 2013). In 2013, a total of 73 outbreaks caused by STEC were reported in the EU, of which the main food vehicle was bovine meat and its products (EFSA, 2015).

Cattle and other ruminants are considered to be the major reservoirs for STEC (Gonzalez Garcia, 2002); however, isolation of this bacterium from other animals has been reported (Terajima et al., 2017). The frequency of STEC in animals is variable. For example, reports from Germany indicated that STEC strains were isolated from 28.9% of sampled animals, most frequently from sheep (66.6%), goats (56.1%), and cattle (21.1%), and in a lower proportion from pigs (7.5%), cats (13.8%), and dogs (4.8%), but STEC strains were not found in chickens (Beutin et al., 1993). However, a study in Belgium reported viable O157 isolates in 37.8% of the farms analyzed (Farrokh et al., 2013). In the United States, E. coli O157 has been reported in 10% to 28% of cattle (Karmali et al., 2010). A lower incidence of STEC O157 was reported in Japan, with 6.4% of beef cattle in 28% of beef farms analyzed, and this serogroup was not detected in any dairy cows tested (Terajima et al., 2017).

The farm environment plays an important role in STEC colonization and recirculation. However, it is known that most range-fed beef calves are exposed to bacteria by the time of weaning; however, after colonization and survival in the gut, cattle can eliminate bacteria over several months via fecal elimination (Karmali et al., 2010). However, some cows and sheep may be high shedders or super shedders, discharging more than 104 colony forming units per gram of feces, and increasing the risk of widespread transmission and contamination. Specific reasons why some animals are in the special shedder stage remain unknown (Callaway et al., 2013, Baker et al., 2016).

5. Listeria

Members of the Listeria genera belong to the Firmicutes division, and are currently classified into 17 species: L. monocytogenes, Listeria seeligeri, Listeria ivanovii, Listeria welshimeri, Listeria marthii, Listeria innocua, Listeria grayi, Listeria fleischmannii, Listeria floridensis, Listeria aquatica, Listeria newyorkensis, Listeria cornellensis, Listeria rocourtiae, Listeria weihenstephanensis, Listeria grandensis, Listeria riparia, and Listeria booriae. Only 2 of these species, L. monocytogenes and L. ivanovii, are considered to be pathogenic (Orsi and Wiedmann, 2016).

The species in the Listeria genera are divided in 2 groups based on the relatedness of species to L. monocytogenes: 1) Listeria sensu strictu, which includes L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri, L. marthii, L. ivanovii, L. welshimeri, and L. innocua; and 2) Listeria sensu lato, a group that includes the other Listeria species (Orsi and Wiedmann, 2016).

L. monocytogenes is the most important and representative species of the genera. It is a small, a Gram-positive rod-shaped, facultatively anaerobic, flagellated, ubiquitous, and intracellular pathogen that grows between −0.4 and 50 °C (Donelly and Diez-Gonzalez, 2013). This bacterium is the causative organism of several outbreaks of foodborne disease. Although L. monocytogenes is responsible for sporadic cases, its importance lies as a leading cause of death related to foodborne illness (up to 24%) (Farber and Peterkin, 1991), which causes a considerable economic impact for society and the food industry.

L. monocytogenes infection can be non-invasive or invasive (Orsi and Wiedmann, 2016). The invasive illness is characterized by severe symptoms such as meningitis, septicemia, primary bacteremia, endocarditis, non-meningitic central nervous system infection, conjunctivitis, and flu-like illness (Donelly and Diez-Gonzalez, 2013). The non-invasive form of listeriosis is characterized by febrile gastroenteritis. The immunocompromised stage and presence of chronic disorders determine the intensity of the Listeria infection (Buchanan et al., 2017).

L. monocytogenes is widely present in plant, soil, and surface water samples, and it has also been found in silage, sewage, slaughterhouse waste, milk from normal cows and cows with mastitis, and in human and animal feces (Donelly and Diez-Gonzalez, 2013). Thus, it is virtually impossible to permanently eradicate L. monocytogenes from food environments (Buchanan et al., 2017).

L. monocytogenes had caused episodes of human listeriosis throughout the world and has been found on all the continents, with isolates reported in North and South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Oceania (Orsi and Wiedmann, 2016). Although control measures have been implemented, there has been no change or even an increase in the trend of listeriosis cases over time. For example, the EU reported a 8.6% increase in listeriosis in 2013 compared with 2012 (Buchanan et al., 2017). The United States exhibited no change in the number of outbreaks caused by consumption of dairy products, but foods considered to be of moderate or low risk (vegetables or ice cream) have been implicated in several listeriosis outbreaks. An increase of the frequency of L. monocytogenes in fishery products at processing plants (mainly smoked fish) has been reported in the United States and the EU (EFSA, 2015).

Food vehicles for L. monocytogenes include crustaceans, shellfish, mollusks and related products, cheese, meat and meat products, pig meat and related products, vegetables, juices and related products, such as mixed salads (Buchanan et al., 2017). Soft cheeses made from pasteurized milk were reported to be vehicles in 5 of 12 listeriosis outbreaks between 2009 and 2011 in the United States (CDC, 2013).

Sporadic cases of listeriosis have been reported in workers in contact with diseased animals (Farber and Peterkin, 1991). L. monocytogenes has been isolated from cattle, sheep, goats, and poultry, mainly on their surface, but various reports also showed that this bacterium was present inside muscle, although at low proportions (Buchanan et al., 2017). In beef and dairy calves, evidence shows a low prevalence of this bacterium in very young calves (<2 months), but its presence increases in the next few months of life, and declines after weaning (Rhoades et al., 2009).

The fecal prevalence of L. monocytogenes on United States farms was found to be of 29.4%; 82% of feed samples harbored Listeria spp. and 62% had L. monocytogenes. Listeria spp. was detected in 67% and L. monocytogenes in 28% of minced beef samples processed at a farm. The prevalence in fecal poultry samples was 33% for Listeria spp. and 33% for L. monocytogenes (Skovgaard and Morgen, 1988).

Although the presence of L. monocytogenes has been demonstrated in animals, Listeria contamination of processed foods is most likely a function of post-processing recontamination.

6. Prevention and control measures

Although it is not easy, it is possible to prevent and get control of enteropathogens carried by animals. Some basic measures are known to be effective to reduce the risk of contamination (Bean and Griffin, 1990, Dhama et al., 2013, DuPont, 2007; EFSA, 2015; Sofos, 2008); and it is imperative that these are applied in farms and processing plants: 1) reduction of the infection burden in farms by increasing the hygiene and separating the sick animals from healthy ones, 2) since most enteropathogens are killed by chilling, it is necessary to increase the monitoring of this condition after slaughter, 3) avoid the cross-contamination, 4) take precautionary measures to check for pathogen spread in the farm and processing environments 5) judicious use of antibiotics for treating animal diseases, 6) application of sublethal multiple hurdles in the food processing and preservation, 7) proper cooking of the food products, and 8) avoid the consumption of raw/uncooked animal products.

7. Conclusion

We conclude that the pathogenic bacteria described here will continue causing outbreaks and deaths throughout the world, because no effective interventions have eliminated them from animals and food. Further research is imperative to develop effective strategies against these bacteria, and these strategies can be a combination of practices and technologies that already exist or those being developed.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.

References

  1. Anderson R.C., Ricke S.C., Lungu B., Johnson M.G., Oliver C., Horrocks S.M. Food safety issues and the microbiology of beef. In: Heredia N., Wesley I., Garcia S., editors. Microbiologically safe foods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hoboken, New Jersey: 2009. pp. 115–146. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker C.A., Rubinelli P.M., Park S.H., Carbonero F. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in food: incidence, ecology, and detection strategies. Food Contr. 2016;59:407–419. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bean N.H., Griffin P.M. Food-borne disease outbreaks in the United States, 1973–1987: pathogens, vehicles and trends. J Food Prot. 1990;53:804–817. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-53.9.804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beutin L., Geier D., Steinrück H., Zimmermann S., Scheutz F. Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin)-producing Escherichia coli in seven different species of healthy domestic animals. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;1:2483–2488. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2483-2488.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchanan R.L., Gorris L.G.M., Hayman M.M., Jackson T.C., Whiting R.C. A review of Listeria monocytogenes: an update on outbreaks, virulence, dose-response, ecology, and risk assessments. Food Contr. 2017;75:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  6. Butzler J.-P. Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:868–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Callaway T.R., Edrington T.S., Loneragan G.H., Carr M.A., Nisbet D.J. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) ecology in cattle and management based options for reducing fecal shedding. Agr Food Anal Bacteriol. 2013;3:39–69. [Google Scholar]
  8. CDC Vital signs: Listeria illnesses, deaths, and outbreaks–United States, 2009–2011. MMWR. 2013;62:448–452. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Croxen M.A., Law R.J., Scholz R., Keeney K.M., Wlodarska M., Finlay B.B. Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:822–880. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00022-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dhama K., Rajagunalan S., Chakraborty S., Verma A.K., Kumar A., Tiwari R. Food-borne pathogens of animal origin- diagnosis, prevention, control and their zoonotic significance: a review. Pak J Biol Sci. 2013;16:1076–1085. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.1076.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Donelly C.W., Diez-Gonzalez F. Listeria monocytogenes. In: Labbé R.G., García S., editors. Guide to foodborne pathogens. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell; Hoboken, NJ: 2013. pp. 45–74. [Google Scholar]
  12. DuPont H.L. The growing threat of foodborne bacterial enteropathogens of animal origin. Food Saf. 2007;45:1353–1361. doi: 10.1086/522662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. EFSA Scientific opinion on quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU. EFSA J. 2010;8:1437–1526. [Google Scholar]
  14. EFSA The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2013. EFSA J. 2015;13:3991. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. EFSA-ECDC European food safety authority and European Centre for disease prevention and control. The European union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J. 2016;14 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis E.M. Salmonella reservoirs in animals and feeds. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1969;46:227–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02544802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eng S.K., Pusparajah P., Mutalib N.-S.A., Ser H., Chan K., Lee L.-H. Salmonella: a review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Front Life Sci. 2015;8:284–293. [Google Scholar]
  18. Farber J.M., Peterkin P.I. Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1991;55:476–511. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.3.476-511.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Farrokh C., Jordan K., Auvray F., Glass K., Oppegaars H., Raynaud S. Review of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and their significance in dairy production. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;162:190–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Feng P. Escherichia coli. In: Labbé R.G., García S., editors. Guide to foodborne pathogens. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell; Hoboken, NJ: 2013. pp. 222–240. [Google Scholar]
  21. Flockhart L., Pintar K., Cook A., McEwen S., Friendship R., Kelton D. Distribution of Salmonella in humans, production animal operations and a watershed in a FoodNet Canada sentinel site. Zoonoses Publ Health. 2017;64:41–52. doi: 10.1111/zph.12281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. García S., Heredia N. Campylobacter. In: Labbé R.G., García S., editors. Guide to foodborne pathogens. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell; Hoboken, NJ: 2013. pp. 188–196. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gonzalez Garcia E.A. Animal health and foodborne pathogens: enterohaemorrhagic O157:H7 strains and other pathogenic Escherichia coli virotypes (EPEC, ETEC, EIEC, EHEC) Pol J Vet Sci. 2002;5:103–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grimont P.A.D., Weill F.X. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella; 2007. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars.http://www.scacm.org/free/Antigenic%20Formulae%20of%20the%20Salmonella%20Serovars%202007%209th%20edition.pdf [Google Scholar]
  25. Hendriksen R.S., Vieira A.R., Karlsmose S., Wong D.M.A.L.F., Jensen A.B., Wegener H. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the world health organization global foodborne infections network country data bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodb Pathog Dis. 2011;8:887–890. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoffmann S., Maculloch B., Batz M. Vol. 17. Current Politics and economics of the United States; Canada and Mexico: 2015. pp. 543–616. (Economic burden of major foodborne illnesses acquired in the United States). [Google Scholar]
  27. Horrocks S.M., Anderson R.C., Nisbeta D.J., Rickeb S.C. Incidence and ecology of Campylobacter jejuni and coli in animals. Food Microbiol. 2009;15:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2008.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaakoush N.O., Castaño-Rodríguez N., Mitchell H.M., Mana S.M. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:687–720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Karmali A., Gannon V., Sargeant J.M. Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:360–370. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kramer J.M., Frost J.A., Bolton F.J., Wareing D.R.A. Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection. J Food Prot. 2000;63:1654–1659. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.12.1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lamas A., Miranda J.M., Regal P., Vázquez B., Franco C.M., Cepeda A. A comprehensive review of non-enterica subspecies of Salmonella enterica. Microbiol Res. 2018;206:60–73. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Majowicz S.E., Scallan E., Jones-Bitton A., Sargeant J.M., Stapleton J., Angulo F.J. Global incidence of human Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections and deaths: a systematic review and knowledge synthesis. Foodb Pathog Dis. 2014;6:447–455. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McMullin P. Salmonellosis S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium. 2004. http://www.thepoultrysite.com/diseaseinfo/133/salmonellosis-s-enteritidis-and-s-typhimurium-infections/ The Poultry Site.
  34. Mohammed M. Phage typing or CRISPR typing for epidemiological surveillance of Salmonella Typhimurium? BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:578. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2878-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nguyen D.T.A., Kanki M., Nguyen P.D., Le H.T., Ngo P.T., Tran D.N.M. Prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and extended spectrum and AmpC ß-lactamase productivity of Salmonella isolates from raw meat and seafood samples in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;236:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Orsi R.H., Wiedmann M. Characteristics and distribution of Listeria spp., including Listeria species newly described since 2009. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;12:5273–5287. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7552-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Park B., Seo Y., Eady M., Yoon S.C., Hinton A., Jr. Classification of Salmonella serotypes with hyperspectral microscope imagery. Ann Clin Pathol. 2017;5:1108. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rhoades J.R., Duffy G., Koutsoumanis K. Prevalence and concentration of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in the beef production chain: a review. Food Microbiol. 2009;26:357–376. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ricke S.C., Koo O.K., Foley S., Nayak R. Salmonella. In: Labbé R.G., García S., editors. Guide to foodborne pathogens. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell; Hoboken, NJ: 2013. pp. 112–137. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sanchez S., Hofacre C.L., Lee M.D., Maurer J.J., Doyle M. Animal sources of salmonellosis in humans. JAVMA. 2002;221:492–497. doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.221.492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Scallan E., Hoekstra R.M., Angulo F.J., Tauxe R.V., Widdowson M.-A., Roy S.L. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Scharff R.L. State estimates for the annual cost of foodborne illness. J Food Protect. 2015;78:1064–1071. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Silva J., Leite D., Fernandes M., Mena C., Gibb P.A., Teixeira P. Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: a review. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Skarp C.P.A., Hänninen M.-L., Rautelin H.I.K. Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Skovgaard N., Morgen C.-A. Detection of Listeria spp. in faeces from animals, in feeds, and in raw foods of animal origin. Int J Food Microbiol. 1988;6:229–242. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(88)90015-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sofos J.N. Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century. Meat Sci. 2008;78:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Suzuki H., Yamamoto S. Campylobacter contamination in retail poultry meats and by-products in the world: a literature survey. J Vet Med. 2009;71:255–261. doi: 10.1292/jvms.71.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Terajima J., Izumiya H., Hara-Kudo Y., Ohnishi M. Shiga Toxin (Verotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli and foodborne disease: a review. Food Saf. 2017;5:35–53. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2016029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zajac M., Wasyl D., Rózycki M., Bilska-Zajac E., Fafinski Z., Iwaniak W. Free-living snakes as a source and possible vector of Salmonella spp. and parasites. Eur J Wildl Res. 2016;62:161–166. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao C., Ge B., De Villena J., Sudler R., Yeh E., Zhao S. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella serovars in retail chicken, Turkey, pork, and beef from the Greater Washington, D.C. Area. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5431–5436. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5431-5436.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Nutrition are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

RESOURCES