Table 1.
Evaluation of the cgMLST scheme suggested previously (Kohl et al. 2014).
| Number of strains | Perc. mean1 | Perc. min1 | Perc. max1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineage 1 | 35 | 97.7 | 96.4 | 98.1 |
| Lineage 2 | 71 | 97.8 | 96.9 | 98.2 |
| Lineage 3 | 28 | 98.1 | 97.4 | 98.4 |
| Lineage 4 | 74 | 99.0 | 96.9 | 99.7 |
| Lineage 5 | 14 | 97.2 | 96.6 | 97.4 |
| Lineage 6 | 15 | 97.7 | 97.3 | 98.0 |
| Lineage 7 | 2 | 97.7 | 97.6 | 97.7 |
| Canettii | 2 | 94.4 | 94.2 | 94.6 |
| Animal⁎ | 10 | 97.1 | 96.6 | 97.5 |
| total | 251 | 98.1 | 94.2 | 99.7 |
1
Percentage of cgMLST genes fulfilling quality criteria, given as mean, minimum, and maximum value.
⁎
Including M. caprae, M. bovis, M. orygis, M. microti, and M. pinnipedii.