Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2018 Jul 30;57(9):459–470. doi: 10.1002/gcc.5

Table 1. Comparison of CMA and CNVDetect filtering.

The raw number of CNV calls output by both the CMA method and CNVDetect for each of the 26 patient samples are reported. These raw sets of CNVs are then filtered and the resulting number of CNVs is provided under the CMA Filter and CNV Filter heading. The final number of CNV calls reported using the clinical CMA analysis with manual review is provided for comparison.

SV Folder
Number
CMA Raw CMA Filter CNV Raw CNV Filter REPORTED
88044 183 8 56 29 3
88048 148 4 53 24 1
88059 125 9 68 42 5
88060 158 6 51 28 2
88061 101 11 72 47 8
88063 126 5 111 89 3
88064 177 7 72 42 2
88065 207 4 52 25 1
88067* 834 415 110 73 10
88070 300 5 57 37 1
88073 329 15 51 28 2
88074 202 8 48 25 3
88076 391 26 36 19 1
88081 250 14 121 68 11
88086 152 17 146 89 7
88088 153 6 43 20 2
88089 193 6 55 22 1
88090 283 16 54 24 2
88091 135 5 47 25 2
88094 160 13 49 29 7
88096 221 16 28 10 2
88099 261 26 51 36 3
88100 120 6 74 47 3
88101 327 20 117 72 7
88102 144 15 58 34 8
88103 163 45 93 63 10
*

This sample failed QC in CMA processing, but was still analyzed for CNV reporting