Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar 19;44(9):1430–1443. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000518

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Experiment 2, learning results. A: Average estimates for the high and low-value categories as a function of trial number for the high and low-risk rooms. Participants learned better in the low-risk room, indicated by the proximity of their guesses to the true values of the scenes (dashed horizontal lines). B: Density plot of prediction errors (PEt) in each room. There were more high-magnitude prediction errors in the high-risk in comparison to the low-risk room. C: There was an interaction for positive and negative prediction errors between risk context and category value, such that participants overestimated the value of the low-value category and underestimated the value of the high-value category to a greater extent in the high-risk room. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.