Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar 19;44(9):1430–1443. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000518

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Experiment 2, memory results. A: Recognition memory was better for items within the high-risk context. B: Absolute prediction errors enhanced recognition memory for the scenes. Item memory was binned by the quartile values of prediction errors within each risk room, each dot represents the average value within that quartile. C: For correctly remembered items, source memory was better for items within the high-risk context. D: A high-risk context and distance between items (number of trials between pairs) increased sequence memory. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.