Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;41(5):529–543. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1426236

Table 3. Methodological quality assessment scoring using an assessment tool for randomized and non-randomized trials.39 .

Study Reporting External validity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Hypothesis / aims Outcomes Patient information Interventions Principle confounders Findings Variability estimates Adverse events Withdrawals Exact probability Represents population asked Represents population included Represents facilities
Alcobendas-Maestro(2012) 1 1 1 1 1x 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0
Arazpour (2013) 1 1 1 1 1x 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
Arazpour (2014) 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
Benito-Penalva (2012) 1 1 0 1 1x 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0
Esclarin (2014) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0
Nooijen (2009) 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Field-Fote (2011) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
Fineberg (2013) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Hornby (2005) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Labruyèrel (2014) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Nui (2014) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Varoqui (2014) 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Study Internal validity – bias Internal validity – confounding Power
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Total score
Participant blinding Researcher blinding Data dredging clear Follow up adjustments Appropriate statistics Intervention compliance Validity & reliability Participant groups from same population Recruitment groups & time periods Randomisation Hidden randomisation Confounding adjustment Withdrawal accounted for Power
Alcobendas-Maestro(2012) 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 5 23
Arazpour (2013) 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 18
Arazpour (2014) 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 15
Benito-Penalva (2012) 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 5 22
Esclarin (2014) 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 25
Nooijen (2009) 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 23
Field-Fote (2011) 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 23
Fineberg (2013) 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 15
Hornby (2005) 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 5 13
Labruyèrel (2014) 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 19
Nui (2014) 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 24
Varoqui (2014) 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 24

1 = Yes, item addressed appropriately, 0 = No, item not addressed or unable to determine. Q5 1x = Partially addressed, 2 = item addressed appropriately.