Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 3;32(4):843–849. doi: 10.21873/invivo.112318

Figure 4. Boxplot of query cosine similarity scores of report impressions and findings. The figure shows the guideline query-based cosine similarityscore (CSS) distributions of conventional free text reports (cFTR) and structured reports (SR) of experienced (ExSR) and inexperienced readers(IxSR) for the impressions (A) and findings (B) sections. The impressions of both readers for SRs received significantly higher CSS than did cFTRs.Evaluating the findings section (B) showed an even more pronounced CSS difference in favor of SRs. There was no significant difference betweenthe CSS of readers after adjusting for multiple testing using Bonferroni-correction (palpha*=0.0167).

Figure 4