Table 4.
Analysis type | LOD threshold (GW)a | LGb | LOD score | QTL peak position (cM)c | % Varianced |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bet Dagan | 3.5 | 5 | 4.1 | 26.3 | 5.0 |
8 | 14.7 | 22.4 | 34.4 | ||
9 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 9.1 | ||
15 | 6.1 | 38.7 | 7.9 | ||
Tzuba | 3.5 | 8 | 5.5 | 21.4 | 7.5 |
9 | 8.1 | 22.3 | 10.6 | ||
15 | 7.0 | 62.9 | 9.1 | ||
AVG | 3.5 | 5 | 4.5 | 21.9 | 5.2 |
8 | 11.5 | 21.4 | 28 | ||
9 | 7.8 | 19.5 | 9.8 | ||
13 | 3.9 | 42.8 | 4.2 | ||
15 | 4.9 | 40.7 | 6.0 | ||
GxE | 3.8 | 5 | 5.2 | 43.6 | 10.3 |
8 | 5.0 | 17.3 | 9.7 | ||
9 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 10.9 | ||
17 | 3.9 | 44.5 | 6.8 |
aGenome-wide LOD threshold obtained by 1000 permutation test
bLinkage group
cPosition of the highest LOD score within the LG
dPercentage of VB date variance explained by the QTL