Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 30;18:1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5988-2

Table 4.

Stepwise Logistic Regression Predicting for At-Risk Gambling compared to Recreational Gambling (n = 6,871)

Odds Ratio & 95% C.I. Wald Statistics p
Casino Gambling
 No Reference group 110.4 < .0001
 Yes 2.73 (2.26, 3.29)
Portion of friends and family regular gamblers 2.16 (1.86, 2.51) 101.0 < .0001
 Instant Lottery
  No Reference group 48.3 < .0001
  Yes 2.04 (1.67, 2.50)
 Daily Lottery Games
  No Reference group 41.6 < .0001
  Yes 1.97 (1.61, 2.43)
 Gender
  Male 1.60 (1.33, 1.94) 24.1 < .0001
  Female Reference group
 Online Gambling
  No Reference group 22.1 < .0001
  Yes 3.31 (2.01, 5.46)
 Born in United States
  No 1.79 (1.37, 2.32) 19.0 < .0001
  Yes Reference group
 Private Betting
  No Reference group 18.3 < .0001
  Yes 1.70 (1.34, 2.18)
 Education
  Beyond Bachelor’s degree Reference group Reference group
  High school or less 1.92 (1.40, 2.63) 16.7 < .0001
  Bachelor’s or some College 1.24 (0.95, 1.62) 2.4 < .0001
 Bingo
  No Reference group 13.4 < .0001
  Yes 1.88 (1.34, 2.64)
 Raffles
  No 1.30 (1.08, 1.57) 7.3 < .0001
  Yes Reference group
Household income .97 (0.95, 0.99) 6.9 .0008
 Mental health problems past 12 months
  No Reference group 6.7 .0002
  Yes 1.36 (1.07, 1.73)
 Alcohol use past 30 days
  No 1.32 (1.07, 1.63) 6.5 < .0001
  Yes Reference group