Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 30;18:1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5988-2

Table 6.

Stepwise Logistic Regression Predicting for Problem and Pathological Gambling compared to Recreational Gambling (n = 6,400)

Odds Ratio & 95% C.I. Wald Statistics p
Daily Lottery Games
 No Reference group 28.2 < .0001
 Yes 3.00 (2.00, 4.50)
Portion of friends and family regular gamblers 2.25 (1.66, 3.05) 27.9 < .0001
 Race/Ethnicity
  White Reference group Reference group
  Other .86 (0.30, 2.43) 0.1 .8420
  Hispanic .70 (0.28, 1.79) 0.6 .3097
  Black 4.60 (2.55, 8.30) 25.8 < .0001
 Casino Gambling
  No Reference group 23.1 < .0001
  Yes 2.65 (1.78, 3.94)
 Gender
  Male 2.62 (1.75, 3.92) 22.1 < .0001
  Female Reference group
 Online Gambling
  No Reference group 19.8 < .0001
  Yes 5.71 (2.65, 12.30)
 Instant Lottery
  No Reference group 15.4 < .0001
  Yes 2.70 (1.64, 4.43)
 Behavioral Addictions
  No Reference group 14.3 < .0001
  Yes 2.34 (1.50, 3.65)
 Education
  Beyond Bachelor’s degree Reference group Reference group
  High school or less 3.27 (1.69, 6.33) 13.2 < .0001
  Bachelor’s or some College 1.20 (0.63, 2.28) 0.4 .3333
 Born in United States
  No 2.49 (1.42, 4.34) 10.3 < .0001
  Yes Reference group
Unhappy Childhood 1.38 (1.12, 1.69) 9.1 < .0001