Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 30;18:1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5988-2

Table 7.

Stepwise Logistic Regression Predicting for Problem and Pathological Gambling compared to Recreational Gambling after Controlling for Number of Gambling Formats Engaged In (n = 6,400)

Odds Ratio & 95% C.I. Wald Statistics p
Number of gambling formats engaged in 2.22 (1.91, 2.57) 112.6 < .0001
 Race/Ethnicity
  Other 0.90 (0.32, 2.52) 0.1 .8959
  Hispanic 0.65 (0.26, 1.62) 0.9 .1712
  Black 4.69 (2.59, 8.50) 26.3 < .0001
  White Reference group Reference group
Portion of friends and family regular gamblers 2.07 (1.53, 2.79) 22.8 < .0001
 Raffles
  No 2.81 (1.76, 4.49) 18.6 < .0001
  Yes Reference group
 Gender
  Male 2.29 (1.52, 3.45) 15.7 < .0001
  Female Reference group
 Born in United States
  No 3.03 (1.73, 5.30) 15.3 < .0001
  Yes Reference group
 Education
  Beyond Bachelor’s degree Reference group Reference group
  High school or less 3.06 (1.57, 5.98) 11.5 < .0001
  Bachelor’s or some College 1.23 (0.64, 2.36) 0.5 .2785
  Beyond Bachelor’s degree Reference group Reference group
 Behavioral Addictions
  No Reference group 9.8 < .0001
  Yes 2.05 (1.30, 3.24)
Childhood Unhappiness 1.37 (1.11, 1.70) 8.5 < .0001
 Poorer health status 1.32 (1.08, 1.61) 7.2 < .0001
  Private betting
   No 2.17 (1.23, 3.85) 7.1 < .0001
   Yes Reference group