Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;13(8):e0203149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203149

Table 5. Sensitivity of AFP and the Doylestown algorithm at times before HCC diagnosis.

Time prior to HCC diagnosis
Marker 1–3 months (n = 104) 6–9 month (n = 52) 12 months (n = 35)
AFP (20 ng/mL)1 58% 30% 36%
Doylestown algorithm (0.50)2 71% 50% 50%
P value3 0.0550 0.0360 0.2250
Power4 0.5530 0.6749 0.5001
AFP (10 ng/mL) 5 68% 42% 54%
Doylestown algorithm (0.25) 6 87% 69% 82%
P value3 0.0029 0.0051 0.0166
power4 0.9170 0.8774 0.7918
AFP (100 ng/mL) 7 28% 12% 13%
Doylestown algorithm (0.75)8 44% 19% 31%
P value3 0.0185 0.021 0.0650
power4 0.9259 0.2569 0.5510

1) Sensitivity using the indicated cut-off (see below) of AFP at either 1–3 months, 6–9 months, or 12 months before HCC detection using a cut-off of 20 ng/mL.

2) Sensitivity of the Doylestown algorithm at either 1–3 months, 6–9 months, or 12 months before HCC detection using a cut-off of 0.50 output units.

3) P value between AFP and the Doylestown algorithm using a one-sided alternative hypothesis test.

4) Power level of this difference.

5) Sensitivity of AFP at either 1–3 months, 6–9 months, or 12 months before HCC detection using a cut-off of 10 ng/mL.

6) Sensitivity of the Doylestown algorithm at either 1–3 months, 6–9 months, or 12 months before HCC detection using a cut-off of 0.25 output units.

7) Sensitivity of AFP at either 1–3 months, 6–9 months, or 12 months before HCC detection using a cut-off of 100 ng/mL

8) Sensitivity of the Doylestown algorithm at either 1–3 months, 6–9 months, or 12 months before HCC detection using a cut-off of 0.75 output units.