Table 3.
Results of the hierarchical logistic regression analyses with having depressive mood as a dependent variable, for male employees (N = 84)
| Independent variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Wald | Sig. | OR | B | Wald | Sig. | OR | |
| Socio-demographic factors | ||||||||
| Age | −.015 | .119 | .731 | .986 | −.043 | .647 | .421 | .958 |
| Years of education | .020 | .211 | .646 | 1.020 | .000 | .000 | .994 | 1.000 |
| Family income | −.124 | .459 | .498 | .884 | −.039 | .026 | .873 | .961 |
| Job grade (low) | −20.339 | .000 | .999 | .000 | −20.843 | .000 | .999 | .000 |
| Character strengths measured by the VIA-72 | ||||||||
| Creativity | −.816 | 2.917 | .088 | .442 | ||||
| Curiosity | .927 | 1.987 | .159 | 2.527 | ||||
| Judgment | .186 | .098 | .754 | 1.204 | ||||
| Love of learning | −.479 | 1.746 | .186 | .619 | ||||
| Perspective | −.159 | .051 | .822 | .853 | ||||
| Love | 1.746 | 4.279 | .039* | 5.729 | ||||
| Kindness | .248 | .127 | .721 | 1.282 | ||||
| Social intelligence | −.176 | .075 | .785 | .838 | ||||
| Teamwork | −2.204 | 4.666 | .031* | .110 | ||||
| Fairness | .684 | .958 | .328 | 1.982 | ||||
| Leadership | −.398 | .400 | .527 | .672 | ||||
| Statistics of the model | ||||||||
| -2LL | 97.972 | 81.454 | ||||||
| Model χ2 | 3.600 (df = 4), p = .463 | 20.118 (df = 15), p = .167 | ||||||
| Step χ2 | 3.600 (df = 4), p = .463 | 16.518 (df = 11), p = .123 | ||||||
| Nagelkerke R2 | .060 | .305 | ||||||
| Classification Accuracy (%) | 69.9 | 71.1 | ||||||
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. VIA-72, 24 Character Strength Alphas Values in Action Survey-72; Sig., significance; OR, odds ratio