Table 4.
Results of the hierarchical logistic regression analyses with having suicidality as a dependent variable, for female employees (N = 151)
| Independent variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Wald | Sig. | OR | B | Wald | Sig. | OR | |
| Socio-demographic factors | ||||||||
| Age | −.045 | 2.276 | .131 | .956 | −.063 | 2.779 | .095 | .939 |
| Years of education | .015 | .173 | .677 | 1.016 | .014 | .107 | .744 | 1.014 |
| Family income | −.142 | 1.090 | .296 | .867 | −.268 | 2.643 | .104 | .765 |
| Job grade (low) | .098 | .007 | .934 | 1.103 | −.107 | .006 | .936 | .899 |
| Character strengths measured by the VIA-72 | ||||||||
| Creativity | .772 | 3.414 | .065 | 2.165 | ||||
| Curiosity | .068 | .037 | .848 | 1.070 | ||||
| Judgment | −1.405 | 5.663 | .017* | .245 | ||||
| Love of learning | −.072 | .043 | .836 | .930 | ||||
| Perspective | .056 | .015 | .901 | 1.058 | ||||
| Love | .757 | 3.778 | .052† | 2.133 | ||||
| Kindness | −1.456 | 6.486 | .011* | .233 | ||||
| Social intelligence | −.148 | .089 | .765 | .863 | ||||
| Teamwork | .005 | .000 | .991 | 1.005 | ||||
| Fairness | .663 | 1.372 | .242 | 1.940 | ||||
| Leadership | .518 | .960 | .327 | 1.679 | ||||
| Statistics of the model | ||||||||
| -2LL | 154.947 | 127.425 | ||||||
| Model χ2 | 2.998 (df = 4), p = .558 | 30.520 (df = 15), p = .010* | ||||||
| Step χ2 | 2.998 (df = 4), p = .558 | 27.522 (df = 11), p = .004** | ||||||
| Nagelkerke R2 | .031 | .286 | ||||||
| Classification Accuracy (%) | 76.6 | 80.7 | ||||||
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, †borderline significance. VIA-72, 24 Character Strength Alphas Values in Action Survey-72; Sig., significance; OR, odds ratio