Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;44(9):632–637. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104722

Table 2.

Decision-maker selected.

Vignette 1
n (%)
Vignette 2
n (%)
Vignette 3
n (%)
Vignette 4
n (%)
Vignette 5
n (%)
No one 14 (11%) 11 (9%) 7 (5%) 15 (12%) 6 (5%)
Person featured in the vignette (patient or care home resident) 49 (39%) 41 (32%) 30 (24%) 32 (25%) 46 (36%)
Family member described in vignette (daughter, son or mother) 46 (36%) 43 (39%) 57 (45%) 60 (47%) 48 (38%)
Medical professional described in the vignette (general practitioner/consultant) 17 (13%) 28 (22%) 26 (20%) 38 (30%) 33 (26%)
Multidisciplinary team following a best interests decision meeting 68 (53%) 75 (59%) 68 (53%) 44 (35%) 75 (59%)
The researcher 14 (11%) 10 (8%) 13 (10%) 16 (13%) 8 (6%)
I don’t know 4 (3%) 7 (5%) 11 (9%) 8 (6%) 7 (5%)
Other 2 (2%) 6 (5%) 3 (2%) 2 (2%) 3 (2%)
Care home manager* 25 (20%) 13 (10%)

Participants selected response for legally authorised decision-maker, shown by scenario. Participants were able to select more than one response in all vignettes. Bold values indicate the option that was congruent with the legal frameworks in that vignette.

*Option in vignettes 3 and 5 only.