Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 9;3(4):304–310. doi: 10.1002/lio2.172

Table 4.

Univariate General Linear Model Analyses Comparing Cognitive Scores for NH, ECI, and CIC groups, While Controlling for Gender, SES, and Vocabulary Knowledge

F value P value
Cognitive measures
Working memory capacity
Digit span (# items correct) 2.04 .136
Object span (# items correct) .09 .917
Symbol span (# items correct) 8.09 .001
Information‐Processing Speed and Inhibitory Control
Stroop control condition (msec) 3 .05
Stroop interference (msec) .89 .413
Nonverbal Reasoning
Raven's (# items correct) 3.01 .054
Speed of Phonological and Lexical Access
TOWRE non‐words (% phonemes correct) .42 .657
TOWRE words (% words correct) .66 .522
Verbal Learning and Memory
CVLT‐II total words recalled (# correct) 2.34 .102
CVLT‐II short delay recognition (# correct) 17.2 <.001
CVLT‐II list B (% words correct) 1.8 .172

F values and P values represent the effect of group (NH, ECI, or CIC). CIC, cochlear implant candidate; ECI, experienced cochlear implant; NH, normal hearing; SES, socioeconomic status.