Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;40(8):1845–1853. doi: 10.1002/hed.25138

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Reference,author, year Population, no. of participants, age, site/lesion type Intervention Outcomes Lengthof follow‐up Result Effect estimate
Duffy et al11 2006 184 patients with head and neck cancer, mean age 57 y, 84% men, 90% white Tailored smoking, alcohol, and depression intervention comprising of CBT and pharmacologic management. Self‐reported smoking cessation rates.
Self‐reported problem drinking rates.
6 mo Smoking: 47% cessation in intervention compared to 31% cessation in control.
Alcohol: 32% improved problem drinking in intervention compared to 30% in control
Smoking: P = .048
Alcohol: P = .853
Ghosh et al22 2016 14 participants either undergoing treatment for or observation of premalignant lesions or who had received treatment for head and neck cancer >5 y previously. Mean age 60 y. Financial incentive for smoking cessation Self‐reported cessation confirmed by exhaled carbon monoxide at 30 d and self‐reported cessation confirmed by a negative urine cotinine assay at 3 mo and 6 mo 6 mo 33.3% cessation in intervention group compared to 0% in control group N/A due to small sample size
Gritz et al23 1993 186 participants undergoing treatment for cancers of the oral cavity (54.9%), pharynx (6%), and larynx (39.1%). Mean age 58.5 y, 73.7% men, 72.6% white A physician and dentist‐delivered smoking cessation intervention involving an initial advice session followed by 6 “booster sessions” Self‐reported cessation confirmed by urine cotinine validation 12 mo At 6 mo: 64.3% cessation rate in intervention compared to 71% in control.
At 12 mo: 63.8% cessation rate in intervention compared to 76.8% in control.
P values not reported but the authors state no significant difference between the groups

Abbreviations: CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy; N/A, not available.