Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;11:5261–5268. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S166614

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of PFS and OS

PFS
OS
HR (95% CI) p-values HR (95% CI) p-values
ALRI (≥14 vs <14) 1.35 (1.02–1.79) 0.034 1.35 (1.01–1.83) 0.048
Age (continuous variable) 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.818 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.222
Gender (male vs female) 0.81 (0.62–1.07) 0.139 0.87 (0.65–1.16) 0.349
ECOG PS (1–2 vs 0) 1.33 (0.94–1.88) 0.109 2.18 (1.50–3.18) <0.0001
Tumor localization (colon vs rectum) 0.98 (0.72–1.34) 0.908 1.09 (0.79–1.51) 0.585
CT regimen (FOLFIRI vs FOLFOX4) 1.27 (0.95–1.70) 0.104 1.07 (0.79–1.44) 0.659
KRAS status (mutated vs wild type) 0.98 (0.75–1.30) 0.910 1.17 (0.87–1.56) 0.296
ITACa treatment (CT+B vs CT) 0.84 (0.64–1.11) 0.230 1.19 (0.89–1.59) 0.228
LDH (>UNL vs ≤UNL) 1.20 (0.90–1.60) 0.202 1.30 (0.96–1.76) 0.095
Liver metastasis
 Only 1 lesion <5 cm vs no liver mts 0.55 (0.28–1.06) 0.076 0.62 (0.30–1.27) 0.191
 Multiple liver lesions or 1 liver lesion ≥5 cm vs no liver mts 1.09 (0.78–1.52) 0.624 1.15 (0.81–1.64) 0.437

Abbreviations: ALRI, aspartate aminotransferase-lymphocyte ratio index; CT, chemotherapy; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; ITACa, Italian Trial in Advanced Colorectal Cancer; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; UNL, upper normal limit.