Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 28;9:1585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01585

Table 3.

Association between Bloom’s classification and the other item attributes.

Knowledge n = 84 Comprehension n = 34 Application n = 46 P
Inferentiala 49 (58.3) 6 (17.6) 30 (65.2) <0.001
Notaa 31 (36.9) 4 (11.8) 7 (15.2) 0.003
5-optionsa 73 (86.9) 30 (88.2) 40 (87.0) 0.979
Item r-PBb 0.35 (0.1) 0.36 (0.1) 0.36 (0.1) 0.891
P-valueb 57.1c (20.3) 59.9c (15.3) 46.8d (14.9) 0.002
DE1b 64.9c (23.6) 65.0 (25.4) 77.0d (21.3) 0.013
DE2b 69.1c (24.4) 68.1c (23.6) 84.4d (23.7) 0.001
DE1r = 1a 50 (59.5) 18 (52.9) 35 (76.1) 0.071
DE2r = 1a 54 (64.3) 21 (61.8) 41 (89.1) <0.005

(a) number of items and columns percentages (in brackets); P in the last column is the p-value associated with the χ2 statistics; (b) means and standard deviations (in brackets); P in the last column is the p-value associated with the one-way ANOVA; different letters (c and d) mean that the difference was statistically significant in the Bonferroni post hoc analysis.