Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 16;15(8):1760. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081760

Table 5.

Percentage of visitors engaged in activities and MET intensity of those activities by age group at rural or urban parks.

Rural Urban
% of Visitors (N = 781) METs % of Visitors (N = 4705) METs
Shelters a
0–12 yrs 11.0 * 1.7 ± 0.2 3.5 * 2.2 ± 0.2
13–18 yrs 34.1 * 1.7 ± 0.3 1.2 * 1.5 ± 0.3
19+ yrs 38.9 * 1.7 ± 0.2 10.1 * 1.5 ± 0.1
Sport fields a
0–12 yrs 25.0 * 2.2 ± 0.4 14.5 * 2.8 ± 0.1
13–18 yrs 8.0 * 3.6 ± 2.4 69.6 * 3.1 ± 0.6
19+ yrs 8.9 2.0 ± 0.1 9.7 2.8 ± 0.2
Playgrounds a,d
0–12 yrs 39.9 * 3.8 ± 0.3 51.0 * 3.5 ± 0.2
13–18 yrs 13.6 3.1 ± 0.9 9.2 3.0 ± 0.4
19+ yrs 18.1 2.5 ± 0.4 15.6 2.2 ± 0.1
Open space b
0–12 yrs 5.1 3.0 ± 0.3 1.9 3.3 ± 0.4
13–18 yrs 3.4 4.5 ± 1.5 2.3 3.3 ± 0.9
19+ yrs 3.6 2.4 ± 0.3 1.7 2.9 ± 0.6
Walking path b,c
0–12 yrs 2.8 3.6 ± 0.6 2.0 3.2 ± 0.3
13–18 yrs 8.0 4.5 ± 1.5 3.6 4.1 ± 0.7
19+ yrs 7.1 3.9 ± 0.7 6.2 3.6 ± 0.3

MET data are mean ± SE. Percentages estimated using a generalized linear mixed model in which setting (rural or urban), age and age × setting interaction were fixed effects, and park pair was a random effect. * Values within row, p < 0.05. a Age by setting interaction for % of visitors, p < 0.05. b Main effect of setting for % of visitors, p < 0.05. c Main effect of age, p < 0.05; a lower proportion of 0–12-year-old youths were observed on paths than 13–18-year-old youths or people 19+ years. d Main effect of age, p < 0.05; children aged 0–12 years were more intensely active than the 19+ age group.