Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;15(8):1766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081766

Table 2.

Ordered Logistic Regression Model of Food Insecurity, 2012–2013.

Covariate Odds Ratio (OR) 95% CI 1
Age
45–54 1.00
55–64 0.81 0.56, 1.16
65–74 0.61 0.39, 0.96 *
75+ 0.46 0.23, 0.91 *
Marital Status
Female, Unmarried 1.00
Female, Married 0.52 0.30, 0.89 *
Male, Unmarried 0.73 0.49, 1.08
Male, Married 0.62 0.36, 1.05 +
Labor Force Status
Employed 1.00
Unemployed 1.58 1.05, 2.36 *
Smoker Status
Yes 1.00
No 0.61 0.44, 0.84 ***
Self-Reported Health
Excellent or Good 1.00
Fair or Poor 1.53 1.10, 2.11 *
Household Income 2
Lowest 20% 1.00
20–40% 0.69 0.45, 1.06 +
40–60% 0.62 0.32, 1.19
60–80% 0.24 0.08, 0.71 **
80–100% 0.12 0.02, 0.95 *
Unknown 0.89 0.56, 1.42
Language & Remoteness
Non-Remote 1.00
Remote-English 0.99 0.68, 1.47
Remote-Indigenous 3 1.57 1.01, 2.44 *
Household Composition
Aboriginal only 1.00
Aboriginal and Non 4 0.40 0.22, 0.69 ***
Household Size
1 1.00
2 1.27 0.80, 2.01
3–4 1.95 1.17, 3.25 **
5+ 2.64 1.28, 5.46 **

1 95% Confidence Interval for the Odds Ratio; 2 Equivalized household income (to allow for welfare comparisons across households of different sizes) placed into quintiles; 3 Indigenous language; 4 Non-Indigenous household members present; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, + p < 0.1.