Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016 Feb 18;47(4):595–607. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1118695

Table 1.

Membership in Latent Growth Trajectory Group as a Function of Treatment Sequence

Mildly Depressed Responders Depressed
Responders		 Depressed
Non-Responders		 Depressed with
Recurrence
 Treatment Sequence (n = 97) (n = 32) (n = 22) (n = 19)
FFT/CWD (n = 61) 32
(33% / 53%)		 10
(31% / 16%)		 8
(36% / 13%)		 11
(58% / 18%)
CWD/FFT (n = 56) 32
(33% / 57%)		 10
(31% / 18%)		 9
(41% / 16%)		 5
(26% / 9%)
Coordinated Tx (n = 53) 33
(34% / 62%)		 12
(38% / 23%)		 5
(23% / 9%)		 3
(16% / 6%)

Note. First percentage reflects rates within latent growth group; second percentage reflects rate within treatment sequence.