Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 3;19(5):573–579. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12417

Table 3.

Summary results of accuracy tests of the Intra‐fraction Motion Management system (IFMM), registration algorithm, and delivery‐after‐shift to a film. The results for IFMM and registration (3D stage method) and the shot measurements are averaged over small (2 mm in each of x, y, and z direction) and large (5 mm in x and y directions, 20 mm in z direction, and 1 degree rotation along y) shift test scenarios. The difference is calculated as measured value minus expected value

Test Average difference ± SD (mm) [Range] (mm)
IFMM accuracy (3D stage method) 0.00 ± 0.12 [−0.27, 0.23]
(Transformation matrix method) 0.08 ± 0.08 [−0.07, 0.15]
Registration accuracy (3D stage method) 0.03 ± 0.06 [−0.06, 0.23]
(Transformation matrix method) −0.01 ± 0.13 [−0.48, 0.21]
Delivery‐after‐shift accuracy 0.24 ± 0.09 [0.08, 0.42]