Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;7:e23. doi: 10.1017/jns.2018.14

Table 2.

Comparison of outcome between the groups at baseline and final assessment, adjusted for wave

(Mean values and standard deviations; effect sizes and 95 % confidence intervals)

Vitamin D Placebo
Baseline Final Baseline Final
Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Effect size* 95 % CI P
CES-D 13·1 7·9 13·6 10·1 12·7 8·9 13·9 9·9 −1·41 −4·33, 1·50 0·339
HADS anxiety subscale 13·0 3·0 13·4 3·0 13·2 2·9 13·2 2·9 0·16 −0·62, 0·95 0·862
Flourishing Scale 45·3 7·1 44·7 10·1 41·9 11·5 44·1 9·4 −1·08 −3·91, 1·75 0·453
Positive mood 3·1 0·7 3·1 0·8 2·9 0·7 3·1 0·8 −0·07 −0·28, 0·14 0·518
Negative mood 1·6 0·4 1·6 0·6 1·6 0·5 1·5 0·5 0·05 −0·11, 0·21 0·538

CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

*

Effect size estimate compares the difference in the outcome measure between baseline and endline between the two groups. Effect size <2 = small, 5 = medium, 8 = large.

Mean composite of nine positive mood adjectives reported daily for three consecutive days.

Mean composite of nine negative mood adjectives reported daily for three consecutive days.