Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;13:118. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0809-7

Table 2.

Data sources

Data source Description Purpose
Data abstraction ▪ Data abstracted from clinical delivery tools ▪ Define who is initiating PrEP and whether persons are appropriately put on PrEP
Technical assistance ▪ TA reports prepared at baseline and 6-monthly ▪Document details of the process of adoption and integration of PrEP delivery and track changes in PrEP implementation processes.
▪ Rapid cycle analysis to convey to facilities for quality improvement
Qualitative interviews: user and provider ▪ Purposefully sampled patient and key informants involved in the delivery ▪ Gain deep understanding of process of adoption and integration of PrEP delivery and track changes in PrEP implementation processes.
Time and motion studies ▪ Primary data collection ▪ Economic evaluation
Exit interviews ▪ Random on spot user structured surveys at the end of clinic visit ▪ User experiences and satisfaction
Random blood draw ▪ Dried blood spots collected at ~ 10% visits on persons using PrEP ▪ Objective assessment of PrEP adherence (tenofovir levels), resistance surveillance
Observation ▪ Informal ▪ Track changes in PrEP implementation processes.