Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;5(8):180914. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180914

Table 1.

Composition and mitochondrial haplotype (mtDNA Hap) of 12 social units sampled off Dominica. Social units were delineated as in Gero et al. [15]. Composition includes past and present sampled members. Well-sampled social units (those for which all adult females were genetically sampled) were used for intra-social unit analyses, and are listed in the top section of the table. The number of genetically sampled social unit members includes only those linked to a single identified individual. The number listed in parentheses counts all sampled social unit members, including samples for which individual identity was unknown. For well-sampled social units, the mean relatedness (mean r) was calculated according to Wang [62]. Members of these social units were also categorized as adult females (AF) or offspring (O). Mother–offspring (1°) relationships were determined using Colony and ML-Relate. Second-degree (2°) relationships were determined using ML-Relate, or inferred-based shared 1° relatives.

social unit social unit members
sex
mtDNA Hap mean
r
age class
relationships (%)
known sampled F M AF O greater than 2°
A 12 12 9 3 BB 0.137 4 8 15.2 12.1 72.7
F 10 9 5 4 A 0.232 5 4 16.7 25.0 58.3
J 6 5 5 A 0.136 3 2 20.0 0 80.0
R 10 7 6 1 A 0.106 5 2 14.3 14.3 71.4
S 4 3 3 A 0.212 3 33.3 0 66.7
U 4 4 3 1 A 0.333 2 2 33.3 33.3 33.3
C 6 1 1 A total 22 18 16.9 15.5 67.6
D 7 (4) 2 3 1 A
N 9 (8) 5 7 1 Aa
P 9 (3) 1 1 2 BB
T 9 (6) 4 6 A
V 12 (3) 2 3 A
total 98 (65) 55 49 16 49 A, 15 BB

aHaplotypes for this social unit were obtained for seven of eight samples.