Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 13;24(9):1867–1875. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy068

Table 8:

Advantages and Disadvantages of Depression and Anxiety Scales

Scale Advantages Disadvantages
PHQ-9 Brief; includes the key content areas for the formal diagnostic criteria
Includes a question on suicidality supporting concurrent screening for depression and suicide risk
Some overlap with symptoms of inflammatory disorders (lacking energy, sleep, and appetite difficulties)
PHQ-2 Briefest of all depression measures Substantial floor effects
HADS Brief
Evaluates depression and anxiety concurrently
Designed for use in medically ill populations, so it minimizes overlapping physical symptoms
HADS-D and HADS-A had lowest sensitivity relative to other measures
Kessler-6 Brief
Sensitive to any form of psychologic distress
Does not distinguish between depression or anxiety, which may be relevant to treatment
PROMIS Depression Brief; 4- and 6-item versions also available
Normative data from community samples available; other languages available
Can be scored even with missing responses for some items
Floor effect
Response pattern scoring for research purposes can be time-consuming, use of simple scale totals more feasible for clinical setting
GAD-7 Brief
Focuses on a common anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder
May not capture anxiety related to anxiety disorders other than generalized anxiety disorder
Possibly only moderate test-retest reliability
OASIS Briefest anxiety measure
Captures severity of any anxiety disorder
Floor effect
Response options are complex
Possibly only moderate test-retest reliability
PROMIS Anxiety Brief; 4- and 6-item versions also available
Normative data from community samples available; other languages available
Can be scored even with missing responses for some items
Response pattern scoring for research purposes can be time-consuming, use of simple scale totals more feasible for clinical setting