Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;13(9):e0203033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203033

Table 3. Respondents’ perceptions towards pharmacogenetics and its implications (n = 617).

Responses the perception items Pharmacists
(n = 238)
Frequency (%)
Physicians
(n = 379)
Frequency (%)
Total
(n = 617)
Frequency (%)
P value
1.Pharmacogenetics is relevant to my current clinical practice.
Agree 164 (69.0) 240 (63.3) 404 (65.5) 0.027*
Neutral 55 (23.0) 121 (32.0) 176 (28.5)
Disagree 19 (8.0) 18 (4.7) (6.0)
2. Pharmacists should be required to have some knowledge of pharmacogenetics.
Agree 214 (90.0) 326 (86.0) 540 (87.5) 0.303
Neutral 19 (8.0) 45 (12.0) 64 (10.4)
Disagree 5 (2.0) 8 (2.0) 2.1)
3. Pharmacogenetic testing should be applied into my clinical practice.
Agree 180 (75.6) 230 (60.7) 410 (66.5) <0.001*
Neutral 50 (21.0) 137 (36.1) 187 (30.3)
Disagree 8 (3.4) 12 (3.2) 3.2)
4. Pharmacists should be asked by healthcare professionals for recommendations on appropriate use of pharmacogenetic testing.
Agree 162 (68.1) 259 (68.3) 421 (68.2) 0.923
Neutral 63 (26.5) 102 (27.0) 165 (26.7)
Disagree 13 (5.5) 18 (4.7) 5)
5. I should be able to provide information on appropriate use of pharmacogenetic testing.
Agree 177 (74.4) 224 (59.1) 401 (65.0) <0.001*
Neutral 43 (18.1) 137 (36.1) 180 (29.2)
Disagree (7.6) 18 (4.7) (5.8)
6. Pharmacogenetics will improve our ability to more effectively control drug therapy expenditures.
Agree 184 (77.3) 225 (59.4) 409 (66.3) <0.001*
Neutral 40 (16.8) 131 (34.6) 171 (27.7)
Disagree 14 (5.9) 23 (6.1) 37 (6.0)

*Significant difference between physicians and pharmacists using Chi-square test