Table 1.
Level of Prevention Practice | Program Strategy | Potential Relevance for Dog Walking: Facilitators and Barriers in Different Practice Settings |
---|---|---|
Individual targeted programs | Health professional advice; individualized counseling; primary care/physician’s offices | ● Potential high population reach |
● Brief advice on dog walking is potentially efficacious | ||
● Specific “dog walking” advice is potentially stronger due to specificity of the behavior | ||
● Challenge is scaling up physical activity advice generated from selected primary care settings to widespread delivery of dog walking advice | ||
Individualized interventions; ehealth; tailored to individual | ● Motivator and “reminder” potential of dog walking groups | |
● Could be supported by social media, dog walking groups on Facebook and other social media | ||
● Act as social support and reinforcement | ||
● Focus on moving from action to maintenance of dog walking behavior | ||
Disease-based group programs (eg, diabetic patients) | ● Potential for referral to dog walking programs to provide physical activity and social support for people with chronic diseases | |
● Difficulty in recruiting participants; transport to dog walking venues; may be suitable only for a subset of all walking-group patients | ||
Veterinarians/animal behavioristsa | ● Clear messaging for the exercise recommendations of dogs by breed type and age, emphasizing that nearly all dogs benefit physically and psychologically from being walked | |
● Reward-based dog training advice to owners to help overcome barriers (eg, dog aggression to people or dogs, pulling on lead, not coming when called) to enjoying dog walking | ||
Group and organizational settings | School or worksite settings | ● Established as a specific approach for physical activity and mental health promotion (eg, among children with and without disabilities) |
● Consider incorporating dog walking into workplace challenges to increase physical activity | ||
Community settings | Local-level community programs, neighborhood programs | ● Main setting for dog walking is in local communities through dog walking groups and clubs |
● Promote and support “loaner” dog walking groups; groups can be formal (ie, via animal welfare organizations) and informal (ie, via neighbors and friends sharing dog walking duties with owners) | ||
● Foster use of local facilities, dog walking routes, animal shelter grounds and adjacent routes, park redevelopment, and off-leash areas | ||
Population-wide high reach settings | Website or ehealth population-wide interventions | ● Potential for wide population reach, and may fit into scalable strategies, but dog walking may be only one component of physical activity promotion |
Mass media/social marketing campaigns | ● Modelling dog walking behaviors used as an achievable strategy for increasing physical activity in large-scale prevention-focused mass media campaigns | |
Policy interventions/large region or national programs | ● Policies at local municipal level around dog walking regulations, infrastructure, and developing dog walking-friendly environments that are compatible with the activities of non–dog walkers | |
● Include dog walking as a specific strategy mentioned in national policy and plans around promoting physical activity |
It is recommended that veterinarian/animal behaviorist professionals use reward-based training methods rather than force or intimidation.