Table 2.
ANOVA analysis of differences between treatments, varieties and their interactions on LB, TN, SP, NO3-N, Pigment, Pn, TS and RS content in burley tobacco seedlings.
Parameters | LB | TN | SP | NO3-N | Chlorophyll a | Pigment | Pn | TS | RS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Varieties (V) | 2.8 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 18.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | |
Treatments (T) | 25.1 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 9.7 | 10.5 |
** | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | ** | |
Varieties (V)*Treatments (T) | 67.8 | 201.9 | 40.7 | 1272.0 | 70.6 | 96.3 | 18.5 | 1244.1 | 3486.5 |
** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Note: LB, Leaf biomass; TN, Total nitrogen content; SP, Soluble protein content; NO3-N, NO3-N content; TS, Total soluble sugar content; RS, Reducing soluble sugar content. Symbols ∗∗ and ∗ indicate significant difference at 0.01 or 0.05, respectively, and ns indicate that there was no significant difference between treatments.