Table 3.
QTL effects estimated by averaging over effects of participation single segment substitution lines (SSSLs) on heading date (HD) in the spring and the fall.
| QTLa | Marker | Position (cM)b | SSSL involvedc | Effect estimated (days)d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The spring | The fall | ||||
| qHd1-1 | RM462 | 0.5 | s1-1 | −2.0e | 2.9 |
| qHd1-2 | RM490–RM259 | 32.4–38.8 | s1-6, s1-8, s1-9, s1-10 | −3.4 | −2.7 |
| qHd1-3 | RM246 | 114.1 | s1-15, s1-17 | −3.8 | −2.3 |
| qHd1-4 | PSM423 | 151.0 | s1-20 | 0.7 | 2.9 |
| qHd2-1 | RM525–RM497 | 118.1–122.8 | s2-11, s2-12, s2-13 | −4.5 | −5.7 |
| qHd2-2 | PSM375 | 142.5 | s2-12–s2-17 | −3.1 | −3.2 |
| qHd3-1 | RM60–RM231 | 0.5–11.5 | s3-1–s3-9 | −9.9 | −7.1 |
| qHd3-2 | PSM381 | 164.4 | s3-27 | −4.0 | −7.0 |
| qHd4 | RM559 | 129.6 | s4-13, s4-15 | 3.2 | 4.5 |
| qHd5-1 | RM153 | 3.0 | s5-2, s5-3 | −1.4 | −2.7 |
| qHd5-2 | PSM208 | 19.5 | s5-3, s5-5, s5-7 | −2.0 | −3.9 |
| qHd6-1 | RM508 | 1.4 | s6-3, s6-5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| qHd6-2 | RM190–RM587 | 7.4–10.4 | s6-3, s6-7, s6-9–s6-12, s6-14, s6-29 | 15.2 | 9.5 |
| qHd7-1 | RM51–RM82 | 0.8–24.8 | s7-1 | −3.6 | −2.9 |
| qHd7-2 | RM70–PSM353 | 80.5–81.9 | s7-4, s7-5, s7-7 | 2.3 | 2.6 |
| qHd7-3 | RM234–RM18 | 93.9–94.7 | s7-7 | 3.7 | 4.6 |
| qHd8-1 | RM547 | 40.2 | s8-4–s8-14 | 16.5 | 8.8 |
| qHd8-2 | RM230 | 105.7 | S8-19, s8-20 | 5.1 | 0.8 |
| qHd9 | PSM400 | 60.8 | s9-4, s9-6 | −3.1 | −1.6 |
| qHd10 | RM596 | 35.1 | s10-3, s10-4 | 5.7 | 2.3 |
| qHd11 | RM286 | 0.3 | s11-1 | −15.3 | −10.1 |
| qHd12 | PSM190PSM193 | 95.1–109.2 | s12-5, s12-6, s12-7 | −1.2 | 1.0 |
aQTL was nominated by qHd followed chromosomal number or -serial number. bPosition (cM) indicated the positions of QTL on chromosomes. csi-j represented jth SSSL on chromosome i. dQTL effects were showed by the effects estimated by averaging over SSSLs involved. eThe negative sign in the table indicated to shorten HD.