Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;8:13232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31377-7

Table 4.

Effects and epistatic effects estimated between QTL qHd3-1 and one of three QTLs, qHd6-1, qHd6-2 and qHd8-2, on heading date (HD) under the spring and the fall (days).

QTL aggregateda DSSLc Effect estimated (days)e Epistatic effects estimated (days)f
The spring The fall The spring The fall
qHd3-1/qHd6-1 b s3-2/s6-5d −5.8*g −5.5*h −5.8* −2.1
qHd3-1/qHd6-2 s3-2/s6-17 −6.9** −6.6** −6.8* −5.2*
qHd3-1/qHd8-2 s3-2/s8-20 −5.3* −7.0** −6.4* 1.8

aQTL aggregated denoted two target QTL that were used in aggregation. bQTL was nominated by qHd followed chromosomal number or -serial number. cDSSL (double substitution segment line) was developed from two SSSLs by MAS. dsi-j represented jth SSSL on chromosome i. eEffect estimated was calculated by the genetic difference between DSSL and the control. fEpistatic effect estimated equaled to the effect of DSSL subtracted the sum of two SSSL effects. gThe negative sign in the table indicated to shorten HD. h, * and ** denoted the significance at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.