Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;62(9):e00859-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00859-18

TABLE 3.

Accuracy and precision for intraday and interday runsa

Antibiotic Concn (μg/ml) (QC level) n Intraday runs
Interday runs
Bias (%) CV (%) Bias (%) CV (%)
Cefepime 0.500 (QC LLOQ) 18 −6.1 to 19.4 6.0 to 7.8 10.9 12.8
1.50 (QC low) 18 −9.0 to −2.9 6.6 to 8.1 −6.6 7.6
75.0 (QC medium) 18 −3.6 to 12.6 2.0 to 3.2 4.0 7.0
120 (QC high) 18 −13.6 to −2.5 4.2 to 5.1 −6.5 7.0
Meropenem 0.100 (QC LLOQ) 18 −12.4 to 18.3 8.3 to 17.5 5.6 18.9
0.300 (QC low) 18 3.3 to 11.3 5.3 to 10.1 8.4 8.5
75.0 (QC medium) 18 −9.8 to −5.5 2.9 to 4.4 −8.2 4.0
120 (QC high) 18 −14.2 to −4.6 6.4 to 8.5 −8.0 7.8
Piperacillin 0.100 (QC LLOQ) 18 −2.5 to 15.3 6.1 to 11.0 4.5 10.8
0.300 (QC low) 16b 8.8 to 10.8 7.8 to 14.6 10.0 11.7
75.0 (QC medium) 18 −10.2 to −5.0 4.9 to 7.9 −7.1 7.0
120 (QC high) 18 −10.6 to −3.6 3.8 to 7.2 −6.1 6.2
Tazobactam 0.250 (QC LLOQ) 18 −4.9 to 10.1 4.2 to 12.0 1.3 9.6
0.750 (QC low) 18 2.7 to 14.3 6.3 to 8.1 9.9 8.4
75.0 (QC medium) 18 −2.0 to 10.1 4.9 to 9.4 5.8 8.3
120 (QC high) 18 −0.7 to 9.7 6.5 to 11.4 5.8 9.8
a

Intraday accuracy and precision were evaluated on three different days, with six samples for each QC level on each day. Interday accuracy and precision were assessed by using the results from these three intraday runs.

b

Outliers were excluded.