Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;8:13241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31628-7

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Measurement results for strain. Relative resistance change versus applied strain of Ag/DS-CF with different sensor configurations (LDS% − LT-CF%) (a). The GF versus applied strain of Ag-DS/CF (R0 = 263–300) (b). Recorded hysteresis curve of Ag-DS/CF during loading- unloading cycles (R0 = 263) (c). The time-dependent response of Ag-DS/CF 80 sensor configuration under dynamic loadings with strains of 5–20% (R0 = 263) (d). Step and hold test for Ag-DS/CF (R0 = 300) (e). The relative resistance change of Ag-DS/CF 80 versus applied strain of 20% for long-term stability test at 3000 repeated cycles (R0 = 300) (f).