Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;373(1757):20170418. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0418

Table 3.

The strength of evidence for ecological models of variation in mating rate, measured under laboratory conditions, after controlling for variation in mating behaviour associated with sexual morphology. Model variables and AICc results are described in table 1. The set of models includes a baseline (intercept-only) model for comparison.

model description AICci Δi model probability evidence ratio adjusted R2
baseline −9.2 0.0 0.22 1.0 n.a.
breeding season length −8.2 1.0 0.14 1.6 0.06
canopy cover −6.9 2.2 0.07 3.0 −0.02
snow depth −6.9 2.2 0.07 3.0 −0.02
precipitation −6.5 2.7 0.06 3.8 −0.04
winter severity −6.5 2.7 0.06 3.8 −0.04
predator presence −6.5 2.7 0.06 3.8 −0.04
presence of other water striders −6.4 2.8 0.06 4.0 −0.05
emergent vegetation −6.4 2.8 0.06 4.0 −0.05
temperature −6.3 2.9 0.05 4.2 −0.06
habitat stability −6.1 3.1 0.05 4.6 −0.07
elevation −6.1 3.1 0.05 4.7 −0.07
water acidity −6.1 3.1 0.05 4.7 −0.07