Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 6.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2013 Sep 1;93(6):508–516. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9782-y

Table 3.

Partial models estimating the risk of carotid plaques

cCSA/tCSA ratio,
worst vs. best
cCSA/tCSA ratio,
2nd quartile vs.
best
cCSA/tCSA ratio,
3rd quartile vs.
best
Model 1 1.39 (0.739–2.62)  1.5 (0.828–2.73) 1.48 (0.825–2.67)
Model 2 1.28 (0.656–2.52) 1.22 (0.648–2.3) 1.37 (0.744–2.52)
Model 3 1.44 (0.752–2.79) 1.42 (0.776–2.62) 1.56 (0.855–2.85)
Model 4 1.23 (0.64–2.35) 1.38 (0.745–2.56) 1.36 (0.75–2.46)
Model 5 1.31 (0.688–2.49) 1.38 (0.756–2.53)  1.5 (0.83–2.72)

Model 1 adjusted for years since menopause, model 2 model 1 + BMI, leptin, and low physical activity, model 3 model 1 + PTH and vitamin D, model 4 model 1 + DHEA-S and free testosterone, model 5 model 1 + diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, creatinine clearance <60 mL/min