Belgium Flanders (BE-FL) |
Flemish macrophyte assessment system (Schneiders et al., 2004, Leyssen et al., 2005) |
Point observations in all homogeneous parts up to 2 or 4 m depth |
SUBM, FLOAT, HELO, FILA, MOSS, CYAN |
5-point scale for individual taxa and 4-point scale for total abundance |
|
Denmark (DK) |
Danish Lake Macrophytes Index (DLMI, Søndergaard et al. 2013) |
Transects |
SUBM, FLOAT, (FILA)*, (MOSS) |
6-point scale for each observation point, translated into % coverage |
|
Estonia (EE) |
Estonian macrophyte assessment system (Portielje et al., 2014) |
Transects for larger lakes, total mapping for smaller |
SUBM, FLOAT, (HELO), FILA, MOSS |
Separate 5-point scales for SUBM, FLOAT and HELO |
|
Germany (DE) |
German Assessment System for Macrophytes & Phytobenthos (Reference Index, Schaumburg et al., 2004) |
Transects of ca. 20 m width |
SUBM, FLOAT, MOSS |
5-point scale for taxa in each depth zone |
|
Latvia (LV) |
Latvian macrophyte assessment method (Portielje et al., 2014) |
Transects |
SUBM, FLOAT, HELO, FILA, MOSS |
5- or 7-point scale |
|
Lithuania (LT) |
Lithuanian macrophyte assessment method (Portielje et al. 2014) |
Transects |
SUBM, FLOAT, (HELO), (FILA), MOSS |
5-point semi quantitative scale |
|
Netherlands (NL) |
WFD-metrics for natural water types (Coops et al., 2007) |
Sampling points of a size of 200 × 200 m for larger lakes and transects for smaller lakes |
SUBM, FLOAT, HELO, FILA, MOSS |
9-point scale for individual taxa and percentage cover for total abundance |
|
Poland (PL) |
Ecological Status Macrophyte Index (ESMI, Ciecierska and Kolada, 2014) |
Transects of ca. 30 m width |
SUBM, FLOAT, HELO, MOSS |
7-point scale for taxa and percentage cover for total abundance |
|
United Kingdom (UK) |
LEAFPACS lakes macrophyte classification tool (Willby et al., 2012) |
Transects of ca. 100 m width |
SUBM, FLOAT, FILA, MOSS, CYAN |
Percentage cover of each taxa |