Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;17:137. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0852-7

Table 5.

Shares of NCMS benefits by economic quintiles, CIs, and dominance tests

Economic status (Quintile) 2008 2013
Actual percentage Need-adjusted percentage Actual amount Need-adjusted amount Actual percentage Need-adjusted percentage Actual amount Need-adjusted amount
Poorest, % 10.54 10.13 7.11 7.16 17.05 14.87 14.31 14.08
Poorer, % 14.22 14.84 8.62 8.97 18.70 18.59 13.37 13.52
Middle, % 22.30 22.96 12.91 14.03 18.37 19.14 13.26 13.54
Richer, % 19.61 19.72 14.06 14.04 20.81 21.71 20.21 20.37
Richest, % 33.33 32.35 57.31 55.80 25.06 25.68 38.84 38.49
CI (SE) 0.2099** (0.0409) 0.2027** (0.0371) 0.3287** (0.0970) 0.3002** (0.0948) 0.0781** (0.0161) 0.1056** (0.0152) 0.1685** (0.0235) 0.1660** (0.0232)
Dominance test
 Against 45-degree line
 Against Lorenz Curve None +

Note:(1) *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; (2) Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were found in all values of CIs between 2008 and 2013 using the z-test. (3) - indicates the 45-degree line/Lorenz curve dominates the concentration curve; + indicates concentration curve dominates 45-degree line/Lorenz curve; none indicates non-dominance; a blank space indicates that the variable is not applicable