Skip to main content
. 1997 Nov-Dec;4(6):511–521. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040511

Table 2.

Actions: Phase 1 vs. Phase 2

Variable Phase 1 (N, % 95% CI) Phase 2 (N, % 95% CI)
KUB receiving ≥ 1 critique* 299/380 (79% ± 4%) 385/864 (45% ± 3%)
Low-yield KUB canceled 8/258 (3% ± 2%) 10/283 (4% ± 2%)
KUB orders changed to suggested* views 39/104 (38% ± 9%) 96/176 (55% ± 7%)
*

p < 0.01 Phase 1 vs. Phase 2.