Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;9:380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00380

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical variables of subjects.

Controls (n = 20) IGDdep−(n = 22) IGDdep+ (n = 21) Test p-value Post hoc test
Age, year 24.0 ± 2.2 24.0 ± 1.6 23.6 ± 2.4 F(2, 60) = 0.267 0.767
Full Scale IQ 107.9 ± 10.7 109.9 ± 11.9 102.2 ± 12.5 F(2, 60) = 2.452 0.095
IAT 26.4 ± 9.8 69.4 ± 12.5 71.7 ± 10.1 F(2, 60) = 111.949 < 0.001 IGDdep−, IGDdep+ > HC
BDI 5.0 ± 3.5 7.6 ± 3.4 25.6 ± 4.3 F(2, 60) = 185.146 < 0.001 IGDdep+ > HC, IGDdep-
BAI 4.8 ± 4.4 6.7 ± 5.1 19.9 ± 9.7 F(2, 60) = 30.498 < 0.001 IGDdep+ > HC, IGDdep-
AUDIT 9.8 ± 7.1 14.1 ± 7.5 11.5 ± 7.8 F(2, 60) = 1.768 0.179
BIS SCALES
Non-planning impulsivity 16.5 ± 5.6 25.6 ± 7.7 22.9 ± 5.4 F(2, 60) = 11.229 < 0.001 IGDdep−, IGDdep+ > HC
Motor impulsivity 12.9 ± 3.3 18.5 ± 4.4 17.7 ± 4.4 F(2, 60) = 11.246 < 0.001 IGDdep−, IGDdep+ > HC
Cognitive impulsivity 11.2 ± 4.0 15.0 ± 2.7 16.1 ± 3.7 F(2, 60) = 11.019 < 0.001 IGDdep−, IGDdep+ > HC
SUSTAINED ATTENTION TASK, NUMBER
Omission error 1.4 ± 2.6 1.1 ± 1.6 1.6 ± 3.6 χ2 = 0.114 0.944
Commission error 5.4 ± 3.0 8.3 ± 7.0 9.2 ± 9.2 χ2 = 1.163 0.559
DIVIDED ATTENTION TASK, NUMBER
Omission error 4.7 ± 6.1 5.4 ± 8.1 10.3 ± 10.4 χ2 = 6.130 0.047 IGDdep+ > HC, IGDdep-
Commission error 3.5 ± 2.2 3.4 ± 5.2 4.3 ± 7.8 χ2 = 1.786 0.409

Group comparisons were conducted by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Because assumptions for normality were not met for the behavioral variables for the attention tasks, the Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparison.

IGDdep−, Internet Gaming Disorder subjects without comorbid depression; IGDdep+, Internet Gaming Disorder subjects with comorbid depression; IQ, intelligence quotient; IAT, Internet Addiction Test; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; AUDIT, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; BIS, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale.