Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 21;74(Pt 9):1295–1298. doi: 10.1107/S2056989018011192

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula 2C6H7N2O+·HPO3 2−·H2O
M r 344.3
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P m n21
Temperature (K) 95
a, b, c (Å) 22.9297 (4), 4.5910 (1), 7.0900 (1)
V3) 746.37 (2)
Z 2
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 2.01
Crystal size (mm) 0.45 × 0.16 × 0.06
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku OD SuperNova Dual source diffractometer with an AtlasS2 detector
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2017)
T min, T max 0.599, 0.831
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections 10796, 1592, 1588
R int 0.021
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.630
 
Refinement
R[F > 3σ(F)], wR(F), S 0.019, 0.054, 2.21
No. of reflections 1592
No. of parameters 181
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.14, −0.15
Absolute structure Since the Flack parameter turned out to equal to 0.012(13) in the final stage of refinement it was set to 0. 726 Friedel pairs used in the refinement.
Absolute structure parameter 0.0

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2017), SIR2014 (Burla et al., 2015), JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2014), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); extinction correction according to Becker & Coppens (1974).