Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;96(9):3757–3767. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky238

Table 5.

Effect of phytogenic supplementation on aromas of broiler breast fillets

AROMA Experimental groups1
C AVHGP SCP BHGP AVSSL SG
Cooked chicken 4.9 ± 0.19 4.9 ± 0.19 4.9 ± 0.19 4.8 ± 0.19 4.9 ± 0.19 4.9 ± 0.19
Brothy 2.0 ± 0.71 1.8 ± 0.71 2.0 ± 0.71 1.8 ± 0.71 2.0 ± 0.71 1.8 ± 0.71
Blood serum metallic 3.0 ± 0.25 2.9 ± 0.25 3.0 ± 0.25 3.0 ± 0.25 3.0 ± 0.25 3.1 ± 0.25
Green herb 0.0 ± 0.49 0.2 ± 0.49 0.0 ± 0.49 0.2 ± 0.49 0.4 ± 0.49 0.3 ± 0.49
Wet feather 1.5 ± 0.77 1.5 ± 0.77 0.9 ± 0.77 1.6 ± 0.77 1.2 ± 0.77 1.1 ± 0.77
Barnyard 0.4 ± 0.06 0.4 ± 0.06 0.4 ± 0.06 0.4 ± 0.06 0.4 ± 0.06 0.4 ± 0.06

Values shown are means ± SEM (n = 94).

1AVHGP = AV/HGP/16; AVSSL = AV/SSL/12; BHGP = bacteriostatic herbal growth promoter with essential oils; C = control; SCP = Superliv Concentrate Premix; SG = Superliv Gold.