Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;96(9):3757–3767. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky238

Table 7.

Effects of phytogenic supplementation on flavor of broiler breast fillets

Flavor Experimental groups1
C AVHGP SCP BHGP AVSSL SG
Cooked chicken 6.1 ± 0.21 6.0 ± 0.21 6.0 ± 0.21 5.9 ± 0.21 6.1 ± 0.21 6.1 ± 0.21
Brothy 1.7 ± 0.56 1.8 ± 0.56 1.4 ± 0.56 1.4 ± 0.56 1.7 ± 0.56 1.7 ± 0.56
Chicken fat 0.0 ± 0.33 0.2 ± 0.33 0.0 ± 0.33 0.0 ± 0.33 0.2 ± 0.33 0.2 ± 0.33
Organy 0.8 ± 0.57 0.6 ± 0.57 0.7 ± 0.57 0.9 ± 0.57 1.0 ± 0.57 1.1 ± 0.57
Blood serum 2.8 ± 0.42 2.7 ± 0.42 2.7 ± 0.42 2.6 ± 0.42 2.7 ± 0.42 2.8 ± 0.42
Metallic 1.5 ± 0.36 1.3 ± 0.36 1.7 ± 0.36 1.4 ± 0.36 1.6 ± 0.36 1.2 ± 0.36
Green herb 0.0 ± 0.54b 0.7 ± 0.54a 0.0 ± 0.54b 0.5 ± 0.54ab 0.5 ± 0.54ab 0.2 ± 0.54b
Cardboard 1.2 ± 0.43 1.2 ± 0.43 1.1 ± 0.43 1.0 ± 0.43 1.2 ± 0.43 1.1 ± 0.43
Wet feather 0.9 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.5 0.6 ± 0.5 0.4 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 0.5
Barnyard 0.4 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.03

Values shown are means ± SEM (n=94).

1AVHGP = AV/HGP/16; AVSSL = AV/SSL/12; BHGP = bacteriostatic herbal growth promoter with essential oils; C = control; SCP = Superliv Concentrate Premix; SG = Superliv Gold. Different letters within a row indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05.