Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 6;18:1099. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5927-2

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with participant reporting CHW visit

Variable Visited by CHW Not visited by CHW Unadjusted OR (95% CI) P-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) P-value
Number 253 (48%) 278 (52%)
Sub-district Giyani 141 (55%) 122 (44%) 1.7 (1.14–2.27) 0.007 1.6 (1.14–2.27) 0.007
Letaba 112 (45%) 156 (56%) Ref Ref Ref Ref
Distance to clinic (km) 1.4 (0–13) 1.6 (0–11) 0.934
Gender Male 51 (20%) 72 (26%) Ref Ref –-
Female 202 (80%) 206 (74%) 1.4 (0.92–2.08) 0.118
Age-group (years) 18–34 years 75 (30%) 100 (36%) Ref Ref Ref Ref
35–59 years 95 (37%) 114 (41%) 1.1 (0.74–1.67) 0.610 1.2 (0.76–1.76) 0.503
≥60 years 83 (33%) 64 (23%) 1.7 (1.11–2.69) 0.015 1.7 (1.08–2.77) 0.022
Source of income Formal 70 (28%) 83 (30%) Ref Ref
Informal 49 (19%) 65 (23%) 0.9 (0.52–1.41) 0.546
Grants 129 (51%) 124 (45%) 1.2 (0.82–1.87) 0.313
Participant knowledge of HIV Yes 229 (91%) 231 (83%) 2.1 (1.08–3.90) 0.029 2.0 (1.06–3.8) 0.032
No 15 (6%) 31 (11%) Ref Ref Ref Ref -
Unknown 9 (4%) 15 (5%)

Abbreviations: CHW community health workers, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

*Participants that refused to answer whether they had been visited by a CHW or not were omitted from the analysis (n = 3). Statistically significant factors in bold