Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;2(9):1021–1029. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1227

Table 2.

NAFLD Protective (N = 54) Versus Population Controls (N = 4455) Comparison: Top Associated Variants in Biologically Relevant Genes

Gene Variant rs# NAFLD Protective With Variant,
N (MAF)
Controls With Variant,
N (MAF)
PolyPhen Prediction ExAC Global MAF Genetic Model P Value
OIT3 Y60 NA 2 (0.02) 0 (0) NA 0 SV allelic 1.42E‐04
ABCA8 P1396L rs148226092 2 (0.02) 0 (0) Probably damaging 8.68E‐05 SV allelic 1.42E‐04
SLAMF7 I13V NA 2 (0.02) 0 (0) Benign 7.15E‐05 SV allelic 1.42E‐04
PINK1 L288 NA 2 (0.02) 0 (0) NA 3.95E‐05 SV allelic 1.42E‐04
PINK1 P289T NA 2 (0.02) 0 (0) Probably damaging 3.95E‐05 SV allelic 1.42E‐04
IL32 C161 NA 2 (0.02) 0 (0) NA 1.61E‐05 SV allelic 1.42E‐04
SMEK2 T723A/ T808A rs76512669 4 (0.04) 20 (0.002) Benign 0.001 SV allelic 1.72E‐04
ORM1 T151 NA 2 (0.02) 1 (0.0001) NA 5.54E‐05 SV allelic 4.24E‐04
HNF1A P379A NA 2 (0.02) 1 (0.0001) Probably damaging 2.10E‐04 SV allelic 4.30E‐04
PKD2L1 L138* NA 1 (0.02) 2 (0.0002) NA 1.90E‐04 SV allelic 8.39E‐04
IL6 D162V rs2069860 5 75 Benign 0.006 GB dominant 0.004
THEM5 P246L NA 1 0 Benign 8.00E‐06 GB dominant 0.006
E168K NA 1 0 Probably/possibly damaging 2.00E‐04
CYP26B1 V456L NA 1 0 Benign 0 GB recessive 0.012

Abbreviations: ExAC, exome aggregation consortium; GB, gene‐based; MAF, minor allele frequency; NA, not available; SV, single‐variant.