Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;2(9):1021–1029. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1227

Table 3.

NAFLD Progressor (N = 28) Versus Population Controls (N = 4455) Comparison: Top Associated Variants in Biologically Relevant Genes

Gene Variant rs# NAFLD Progressors With Variant,
N (MAF)
Controls With Variant,
N (MAF)
PolyPhen Prediction ExAC Global MAF Genetic Model P Value
PNPLA3 P149 rs738408 24 (0.61) 1826 (0.23) NA 0.26 SV allelic (and recessive) 2.09E‐09
PNPLA3 I148M rs738409 24 (0.61) 1826 (0.23) Probably damaging 0.26 SV allelic (and recessive) 2.10E‐09
PARVB W37R rs1007863 23 (0.70) 2691 (0.40) Benign 0.44 SV allelic (and recessive) 8.20E‐06
SAMM50 D110G rs3761472 17 (0.38) 1329 (0.16) Benign 0.21 SV allelic 1.45E‐04
TM6SF2 E167K rs58542926 9 (0.20) 549 (0.06) Probably/possibly damaging 0.07 SV allelic 8.88E‐04
MPO I717V rs2759 4 (0.11) 237 (0.03) Benign 0.02 SV recessive 7.76E‐04
HIST1H2BC FS (chr6: 26124019 insT) NA 1 1 NA 0 GB dominant 0.002
A22S NA 1 1 Unknown 2.00E‐05
AZGP1 H214Q NA 1 1 Benign 2.00E‐05 GB dominant 0.007
A46V rs142669146 1 0 Benign 1.00E‐04
MRGPRX1 Q307R rs138752944 1 0 Benign 3.00E‐04 GB recessive 7.75E‐04
Q307* rs140371088 1 0 NA 3.00E‐04
Y272C NA 1 0 Probably damaging 1.00E‐04
CYP26B1 A420G and R191H rs7568553 and rs76025186 1 0 Benign and probably damaging 0.005 and 0.001 GB compound‐heterozygous 0.006
EFCAB13 K244* and T577R/T481R NA and rs142664574 1 0 NA and possibly damaging/benign 2.00E‐05 and 0.005 GB compound‐heterozygous 0.007

Note: Italicized and bolded variants reached statistical significance.

Abbreviations: ExAC, exome aggregation consortium; GB, gene‐based; MAF, minor allele frequency; NA, not available; SV, single‐variant