Skip to main content
. 2018 May 28;30(4):324–329. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.05.007

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics comparing PCA, PCAP and D1 between Group I and Group II.

Interdental area Group PCA PCAP D1
PM/CA (14/13) Group I M/F 1.89 ± 0.57 25.71 ± 7.31 4.41 ± 0.64
Group II M/F 1.87 ± 0.62 24.75 ± 7.20 4.69 ± 0.64
p-value 0.02(0.7830), NS 0.95(0.3519), NS 0.27(0.0107), S



CA/LI (13/12) Group I M/F 2.29 ± 0.65 25.81 ± 7.43 4.42 ± 0.60
Group II M/F 2.37 ± 0.45 26.34 ± 8.76 4.74 ± 0.80
p-value 0.08(0.3906), NS 0.55(0.6269), NS 0.27(0.0189), S



LI/CI (12/11) Group I M/F 3.25 ± 0.73 40.13 ± 8.83 4.65 ± 0.89
Group II M/F 3.24 ± 0.86 39.16 ± 9.42 4.94 ± 1.06
p-value 0.008(0.9421), NS 0.97(0.4506), NS 0.29(0.0380), S



CI/CI (11/21) Group I M/F 3.94 ± 0.91 40.52 ± 9.26 4.96 ± 0.90
Group II M/F 3.74 ± 1.18 37.44 ± 10.57 5.50 ± 0.93
p-value 0.1924, NS 0.0298, S 0.0001, HS



CI/LI (21/22) Group I M/F 3.25 ± 0.71 39.60 ± 10.54 4.41 ± 0.76
Group II M/F 3.38 ± 1.05 38.84 ± 10.39 5.31 ± 1.06
p-value 0.2901, NS 0.6087, NS <0.0001, HS



LI/CA (22/23) Group I M/F 2.52 ± 0.60 28.12 ± 8.03 4.37 ± 0.59
Group II M/F 2.66 ± 0.67 27.92 ± 6.58 4.96 ± 0.86
p-value 0.1274, NS 0.8440, NS <0.0001, HS



CA/PM (23/24) Group I M/F 2.11 ± 0.58 28.61 ± 8.59 4.40 ± 0.65
Group II M/F 2.13 ± 0.60 27.14 ± 6.22 4.84 ± 0.78
p-value 0.016(0.8448), NS 1.46(0.1677), NS 0.44(<0.0001), HS

PCA = Proximal contact area, PCAP = Proximal contact area proportion, D1 = Distance of bone crest to apical contact point, NS = Non-significant, S = Significant, HS = Highly significant.