Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2018 Aug 20;57(10):485–494. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22643

Table 2.

IHC expression analysis of selected genes among three molecular subtypes of ULM

No. cases MED12 ULM HMGA2 ULM FH ULM MM Controls p-value*

25 15 27 40
ER-% Median (low-high 95% CI) 60 (50.4–60.9) 80.0 (62.8–85.2) 45.0 (29.8–55.5) 70.0 (58.1–74.0) 0.0007
ER-I Median (low-high 95% CI) 2.0 (1.76–2.24) 3.0 (2.11–2.82) 1.0 (0.61–1.30) 2.0 (1.88–2.43) 0.0001
PR-% Median (low-high 95% CI) 70.0 (51.2–71.2) 80.0 (56.3–81.0) 90.0 (73.9–89.9) 75.0 (66.0–78.0) 0.0056
PR-I Median (low-high 95% CI) 2.0 (1.84–2.56) 3.0 (2.18–2.89) 3.0 (2.59–3.03) 2.0 (2.04–2.46) 0.0044
IGF2BP2-I Median (low-high 95% CI) 1.0 (0.31–0.92 3.0 (1.99–2.81) 1.0 (0.72––1.28) 1.0 (0.58–0.92) 0.0001
pAKT-I Median (low-high 95% CI) 1.0 (1.20–1.66) 3.0 (2.25–2.95) 1.0 (1.26–1.67) 2.0 (1.48–1.92) 0.0001
pS6-I Median (low-high 95% CI) 1.0 (1.23–1.68) 3.0 (2.32–2.88) 2.0 (1.35–1.77) 2.0 (1.37–1.84) 0.0001
Ki-67-% Median (low-high 95% CI) 2.0 (1.98–4.50) 10.0 (5.56–14.04) 1.0 (0.23–2.37) 1.0 (0.57–2.01) 0.0001
P16-% Median (low-high 95% CI) 5.0 (4.47–12.25) 1.0 (0.01–3.09) 5.0 (4.90–17.10) 1.0 (0.65–2.84) 0.0060
*

One way Anova analysis.