Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep;39(9):1703–1709. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5738

Table 2:

Group medians and IQRs of neck vessel total cross-sectional area at baseline, and follow-up in HC (n = 22) and MS (n = 69) groups

Vessel/Cervical Level HC BL CSA (mm2) (Median) (IQR) MS BL CSA (mm2) (Median) (IQR) BL CSA MS vs HC (P Value) HC FU CSA (mm2) (Median) (IQR) MS FU CSA (mm2) (Median) (IQR) FU CSA MS vs HC (P Value) HC CSA BL vs FU (P Value) MS CSA BL vs FU (P Value) BL-to-FU MS vs HC CSA (P Value)
CCA–ICAs
    C3 67.5 (28.1) 54.5 (28.3) .298a 75.6 (30.7) 57.6 (32.9) .248a .223c .993c .699e
    C4 73.4 (19.9) 79.3 (28.2) .298a 73.2 (12.9) 77.5 (27.3) .535a .57c .048c,g .365e
    C5 69.7 (14.7) 75.7 (20.9) .298a 67.0 (7.9) 70.9 (23.5) .248a .168c .361c .365e
    C6 66.7 (10.8) 71.5 (16.7) .318a 66.5 (9.7) 67.8 (19.4) .474a .223c .222c .603e
    C7 69.1 (8.9) 69.7 (19.8) .795a 66.3 (7.9) 66.5 (20.3) .474a .030c,g .005c,g .36e
    WV 68.8 (16.4) 71.8 (26.2) .605b 68.1 (15.8) 69.0 (26.7) .632b .206d .012d,g .967f
VAs
    C3 31.9 (6.5) 31.7 (6.9) .597a 28.7 (11.5) 30.3 (7.2) .718a .070c .028c,g .921e
    C4 30.1 (8.5) 30.0 (5.9) .597a 28.8 (10.8) 29.7 (6.5) .779a .288c .028c,g .921e
    C5 29.1 (8.0) 29.4 (6.0) .597a 29.4 (10.6) 29.4 (6.3) .948a .570c .051c .921e
    C6 28.4 (7.6) 29.7 (6.9) .588a 27.6 (8.4) 28.9 (7.0) .718a .570c .051c .921e
    C7 28.4 (9.2) 29.2 (8.1) .588a 27.0 (8.0) 28.6 (8.0) .718a .570c .028c,g .92e
    WV 29.7 (7.9) 30.5 (7.5) .406b 28.5 (9.8) 29.6 (7.9) .377b .119d .012d,g .866f
IJVs
    C3 100.8 (59.9) 105.3 (59.7) .956a 94.8 (52.9) 90.6 (60.8) .970a .444c .014c,g .987e
    C4 111.4 (44.8) 121.8 (67.9) .956a 107.6 (63.9) 102.8 (74.0) .970a .444c .008c,g .987e
    C5 117.1 (86.7) 122.4 (59.8) .956a 103.9 (89.3) 107.9 (71.6) .970a .444c .010c,g .987e
    C6 116.7 (124.2) 118.7 (91.6) .956a 86.7 (120.0) 101.4 (86.9) .970a .444c .010c,g .987e
    C7 116.9 (174.2) 126.3 (95.4) .956a 109.4 (111.6) 113.2 (90.7) .970a .935c .008c,g .987e
    WV 111.9 (87.0) 119.5 (73.5) .790b 99.3 (76.1) 103.8 (76.4) .913b .424d .002d,g .680f

Note:—BL indicates baseline; FU, follow-up.

a–f

Group medians and IQR of neck vessel total CSA at baseline and follow-up are reported for HC and MS at each cervical level and for the WV course. To evaluate CSA differences between HC and MS groups at baseline and at follow-up, an independent-samples Mann-Whitney U test (a) was used at each cervical level, while linear mixed models were used for the WV (b). To evaluate differences between baseline and follow-up within each group, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (c) was used at each cervical level, while linear mixed models were used for the WV (d). To perform baseline-to-follow-up CSA comparison between groups, linear mixed models were used at each cervical level (e) and for the WV (f). The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was performed to correct for multiple comparisons.

g

An α level of .05 was considered significant.